# Ferromagnetic fluctuations and odd-parity pairing

Separate triplet-pairing models from magnetic evidence, compare uranium compounds under stated conditions, and trace the limits of Knight shifts and critical fields.

## Scope

Ferromagnetic fluctuations describe enhanced magnetic response near zero momentum transfer. They can support odd-parity pairing in specified models, but neither a large uniform susceptibility nor a large upper critical field identifies a superconducting spin state. Magnetic order, correlations, gap symmetry and the pairing interaction are separate questions. Fay and Appel calculated equal-spin p-state pairing from longitudinal fluctuations in an itinerant-electron model; this is a theoretical possibility, not a universal material classification. [R1](#ref-source-82c04c9061dbca4c)

## Mathematical assumptions

For a simple effective exchange $V=-J\boldsymbol{\sigma}_1\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}_2$ with $J>0$, the spin operator has eigenvalues $-3$ in the singlet and $+1$ in the triplet sector. The corresponding interaction eigenvalues are $+3J$ and $-J$. This independent two-spin illustration assumes a ferromagnetic effective interaction; it does not derive a material's exchange constant or its frequency dependence.

For even-frequency, single-orbital pairing, Fermi antisymmetry requires $\Delta(\mathbf k)=-\Delta^T(-\mathbf k)$. Writing a triplet matrix as $\Delta=(\mathbf d\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)i\sigma_y$ gives a symmetric spin matrix, so $\mathbf d(-\mathbf k)=-\mathbf d(\mathbf k)$. Odd parity here follows from these assumptions. Strong spin–orbit coupling requires a suitable pseudospin description; additional orbital or frequency structure changes this elementary argument.

A second independent illustration uses a circular two-dimensional Fermi surface and an attractive angular kernel $V(\theta)=-g/(a-b\cos\theta)$, with $g>0$ an energy scale and dimensionless $a>b>0$. Its dimensionless Fourier coefficients are

$$C_\ell=\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\frac{\cos(\ell\theta)}{a-b\cos\theta}=\frac{r^\ell}{\sqrt{a^2-b^2}},\qquad r=\frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-b^2}}{b},\quad \ell\geq0.$$

The odd-parity projection $[V(\theta)-V(\theta+\pi)]/2$ retains odd angular harmonics. Since $0<r<1$, the strongest attractive odd harmonic in this example is $\ell=1$. Numerical quadrature checks the coefficients and projection. Crystal anisotropy, competing interactions and self-energy are absent: this example neither selects a universal p-wave state nor predicts a transition temperature.

## Experimental criteria

UGe2 superconductivity was reported in a restricted pressure range within an itinerant-ferromagnetic setting. URhGe supplied ambient-pressure thermodynamic evidence for coexistence; UCoGe supplied ambient-pressure superconducting and ferromagnetic signatures. These primary abstracts support the historical observations, while microscopic volume overlap and a particular gap representation require more than proximity in a phase diagram. Corrected original links replace two inherited citation errors. [R2](#ref-source-db2917242488a101) [R3](#ref-source-15aec45a868e9fb9) [R5](#ref-source-a4695ba5bfa789f3)

Lévy and colleagues reported a second superconducting pocket in URhGe around spin-axis reorientation near 12 T for field parallel to the crystal b axis, after low-field superconductivity had already disappeared. This is an orientation-specific re-entrant phenomenon. The original abstract suggests a connection to spin rotation; it does not uniquely establish a microscopic pairing kernel. [R4](#ref-source-e917adb251d93c59)

Pustogow and colleagues' 2019 Sr2RuO4 author manuscript reports a reduced oxygen-17 Knight shift and strong pulse-energy sensitivity. Its unstrained example uses an in-plane b-axis field of 0.7107 T; 20 mK is the base temperature, not a transition temperature. Selected methods explain why RF heating and different electronic/nuclear relaxation times can make a relaxation check insufficient. These observations challenge older unchanged-susceptibility interpretations; this entry does not infer a unique order parameter from them. [R6](#ref-source-c7f8b99a795aba41)

UTe2's discovery paper reported unusual anisotropic critical fields in a paramagnetic normal state. Its page 2 distinguishes a highest measured field of 20 T from an estimated zero-temperature b-axis value of 40 T. The estimate is not a measured endpoint. Historical triplet and ferromagnetic-pairing interpretations remain interpretations; the paper's schematic does not establish one continuous phase diagram shared by different uranium compounds. [R7](#ref-source-ca6322be2694e430)

Record field direction, pressure, composition, purity and temperature for each probe. Separate orbital/background contributions and pulse heating in Knight shifts; retain coupling, g-factor, multiband and orbital-limiting assumptions in critical-field comparisons. Combine symmetry-sensitive measurements with magnetic and superconducting volume evidence from the same sample. A bulk signal alone does not identify the mediating fluctuation.

## Limits and disputes

In UTe2, Duan and colleagues reported a neutron resonance associated with antiferromagnetic wavevectors. Their extended-data comparison found no ferromagnetic signal above background in the stated measurement window. This is not absence of every possible small-momentum fluctuation at every field, energy and temperature; a resonance coupled to superconductivity also does not alone prove the direction of causation. [R8](#ref-source-df199ac9453d6985)

A study published on 29 April 2026 measured UTe2 magnetotropic response in pulsed fields up to 60 T at 4 K, where the studied superconducting phases were suppressed. It inferred enhanced transverse, near-zero-momentum susceptibility at high fields. Here transverse means perpendicular to the applied field, not an off-diagonal tensor component. These normal-state measurements differ from zero/low-field neutron conditions. The displayed 300 mK superconducting boundaries came from earlier work, and 4 K must not be recorded as this experiment's superconducting transition. [R9](#ref-source-15cfc4a2f9587af0)

Fluctuations can enhance attraction while also renormalizing quasiparticles and affecting pair breaking. Fay–Appel's model gives a maximum followed by a decrease of calculated transition temperature toward the magnetic transition. Neither that model nor the elementary angular projection proves a universal optimum at a ferromagnetic quantum critical point. Longitudinal/transverse spectral weight, spin–orbit coupling and band structure must be specified. [R1](#ref-source-82c04c9061dbca4c)

## Discovery implications

Treat small-momentum magnetic response as a candidate-screening observation. Test whether a proposed kernel simultaneously explains symmetry constraints, normal-state responses and field/pressure trends under matched conditions. Keep negative observations and alternative channels. The recent UTe2 comparison illustrates why distinct experiments should retain their conditions instead of being reduced to a single ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic label. Selected source passages and model checks here leave full scientific acceptance open.

## Related topics

Compare [antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations](/scwiki/spin-fluctuation-pairing), [Eliashberg theory](/scwiki/eliashberg-strong-coupling) and the keyword catalogue for gap symmetry, critical fields and uranium material families.

## Material cases

Values describe individual reports, not a ranking. Unknown means the checked source did not supply the field at this review scope.

| Material and sample | Reported temperature | Criterion | Probe | Pressure | State | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 (aliases: heavy fermion, heavy fermions); Zambra et al.2026 single-crystal magnetotropic response | 4 K; 4 K normal-state measurement;300mK superconducting boundaries in comparison figure are from earlier work | normal-state; magnetotropic-response | Pulsed fields up to60T; field rotations in ac/bc planes; transverse susceptibility inferred from magnetotropic response | unknown; unknown GPa | unknown | experiment; [source](#ref-source-15cfc4a2f9587af0) |

## Sources

### Ref source-82c04c9061dbca4c

[R1] Coexistence of p-state superconductivity and itinerant ferromagnetism (1980). [DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3173](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3173). Publication: journal-article. Check: primary-abstract-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Fay–Appel abstract: longitudinal-fluctuation equal-spin model and nonmonotonic calculated Tc. Full calculation not read or reproduced. The article two-spin/angular examples are independent editorial illustrations, not equations attributed to this paper.
### Ref source-db2917242488a101

[R2] Superconductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism in UGe2 (2000). [DOI 10.1038/35020500](https://doi.org/10.1038/35020500). Publication: journal-article. Check: publisher-abstract-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Saxena et al. publisher indexed abstract and Crossref identity checked. Restricted-pressure superconductivity; original curves and microscopic coexistence not audited. Replaces inherited DOI35050500 whose actual target remained unresolved.
### Ref source-15aec45a868e9fb9

[R3] Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in URhGe (2001). [DOI 10.1038/35098048](https://doi.org/10.1038/35098048). Publication: journal-article. Check: publisher-abstract-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Aoki et al. publisher indexed abstract: ambient-pressure thermodynamic evidence, with qualified triplet interpretation. Corrects inherited35065045, which identifies unrelated semiconductor melting research. Full data not reanalyzed.
### Ref source-e917adb251d93c59

[R4] Magnetic Field-Induced Superconductivity in the Ferromagnet URhGe (2005). [DOI 10.1126/science.1115498](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115498). Publication: journal-article. Check: primary-abstract-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Levy et al. original abstract as indexed by PubMed: field along b, spin reorientation12T, second superconducting pocket. Full text and phase boundaries not audited; associated commentary1117436 is not the original research.
### Ref source-a4695ba5bfa789f3

[R5] Superconductivity on the Border of Weak Itinerant Ferromagnetism in UCoGe (2007). [DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.067006](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.067006). Publication: journal-article. Check: publisher-abstract-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Huy et al. original abstract: ambient-pressure bulk signatures. Curie3K and best-sample resistive0.8K are distinct; no sample Tc extracted here. Full curves not reviewed.
### Ref source-c7f8b99a795aba41

[R6] Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance (2019). [DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1596-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1596-2). Publication: journal-article. Check: author-manuscript-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Pustogow et al. v1 selected pp.4–7; p.7 RF-energy and heating passage visually checked. Zero-strain0.7107T versus strained1.9980T conditions distinguished. Published identity checked; full final-version equivalence and subsequent literature survey not completed.
### Ref source-ca6322be2694e430

[R7] Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity (2019). [DOI 10.1126/science.aav8645](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav8645). Publication: journal-article. Check: primary-passages-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Ran et al. published paper pp.1–2; p.2 visually checked: maximum measured20T versus extrapolated b-axis40T. Historical spin/pairing interpretations are not adopted as settled consensus. Supplement and raw data not fully audited.
### Ref source-df199ac9453d6985

[R8] Resonance from antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations for superconductivity in UTe2 (2021). [DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04151-5](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04151-5). Publication: journal-article. Check: publisher-passages-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Duan et al. publisher indexed abstract and Extended Data Fig.7 text checked: AFM resonance and no FM signal above background within specified window. Complete spectra and raw data not reproduced; not an exclusion of all FM fluctuations.
### Ref source-15cfc4a2f9587af0

[R9] Giant transverse magnetic fluctuations at the edge of re-entrant superconductivity in UTe2 (2026). [DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-71899-7](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71899-7). Publication: journal-article. Check: publisher-passages-scoped-check. Checked: 2026-10-18. Zambra et al., published29April2026. Selected introduction/results, Eq.1 and Fig.1 caption checked:4K normal state, pulsedfields to60T, transverse relative to applied field;300mK phase boundaries reproduced from earlier work. No raw-data or complete spectral/pairing-kernel reconstruction.

## Claim evidence and conditions

### scwiki-b4-claim-scope-1

Ferromagnetic fluctuations describe enhanced magnetic response near zero momentum transfer. They can support odd-parity pairing in specified models, but neither a large uniform susceptibility nor a large upper critical field identifies a superconducting spin state. Magnetic order, correlations, gap symmetry and the pairing interaction are separate questions. Fay and Appel calculated equal-spin p-state pairing from longitudinal fluctuations in an itinerant-electron model; this is a theoretical possibility, not a universal material classification.

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-mathematical-assumptions-1

For a simple effective exchange $V=-J\boldsymbol{\sigma}_1\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}_2$ with $J>0$, the spin operator has eigenvalues $-3$ in the singlet and $+1$ in the triplet sector. The corresponding interaction eigenvalues are $+3J$ and $-J$. This independent two-spin illustration assumes a ferromagnetic effective interaction; it does not derive a material's exchange constant or its frequency dependence.

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-mathematical-assumptions-2

For even-frequency, single-orbital pairing, Fermi antisymmetry requires $\Delta(\mathbf k)=-\Delta^T(-\mathbf k)$. Writing a triplet matrix as $\Delta=(\mathbf d\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)i\sigma_y$ gives a symmetric spin matrix, so $\mathbf d(-\mathbf k)=-\mathbf d(\mathbf k)$. Odd parity here follows from these assumptions. Strong spin–orbit coupling requires a suitable pseudospin description; additional orbital or frequency structure changes this elementary argument.

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-mathematical-assumptions-3

A second independent illustration uses a circular two-dimensional Fermi surface and an attractive angular kernel $V(\theta)=-g/(a-b\cos\theta)$, with $g>0$ an energy scale and dimensionless $a>b>0$. Its dimensionless Fourier coefficients are

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-mathematical-assumptions-4

$$C_\ell=\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\frac{\cos(\ell\theta)}{a-b\cos\theta}=\frac{r^\ell}{\sqrt{a^2-b^2}},\qquad r=\frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-b^2}}{b},\quad \ell\geq0.$$

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-mathematical-assumptions-5

The odd-parity projection $[V(\theta)-V(\theta+\pi)]/2$ retains odd angular harmonics. Since $0<r<1$, the strongest attractive odd harmonic in this example is $\ell=1$. Numerical quadrature checks the coefficients and projection. Crystal anisotropy, competing interactions and self-energy are absent: this example neither selects a universal p-wave state nor predicts a transition temperature.

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-experimental-criteria-1

UGe2 superconductivity was reported in a restricted pressure range within an itinerant-ferromagnetic setting. URhGe supplied ambient-pressure thermodynamic evidence for coexistence; UCoGe supplied ambient-pressure superconducting and ferromagnetic signatures. These primary abstracts support the historical observations, while microscopic volume overlap and a particular gap representation require more than proximity in a phase diagram. Corrected original links replace two inherited citation errors.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-db2917242488a101, source-15aec45a868e9fb9, source-a4695ba5bfa789f3.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-experimental-criteria-2

Lévy and colleagues reported a second superconducting pocket in URhGe around spin-axis reorientation near 12 T for field parallel to the crystal b axis, after low-field superconductivity had already disappeared. This is an orientation-specific re-entrant phenomenon. The original abstract suggests a connection to spin rotation; it does not uniquely establish a microscopic pairing kernel.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-e917adb251d93c59.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-experimental-criteria-3

Pustogow and colleagues' 2019 Sr2RuO4 author manuscript reports a reduced oxygen-17 Knight shift and strong pulse-energy sensitivity. Its unstrained example uses an in-plane b-axis field of 0.7107 T; 20 mK is the base temperature, not a transition temperature. Selected methods explain why RF heating and different electronic/nuclear relaxation times can make a relaxation check insufficient. These observations challenge older unchanged-susceptibility interpretations; this entry does not infer a unique order parameter from them.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-c7f8b99a795aba41.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-experimental-criteria-4

UTe2's discovery paper reported unusual anisotropic critical fields in a paramagnetic normal state. Its page 2 distinguishes a highest measured field of 20 T from an estimated zero-temperature b-axis value of 40 T. The estimate is not a measured endpoint. Historical triplet and ferromagnetic-pairing interpretations remain interpretations; the paper's schematic does not establish one continuous phase diagram shared by different uranium compounds.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-ca6322be2694e430.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-experimental-criteria-5

Record field direction, pressure, composition, purity and temperature for each probe. Separate orbital/background contributions and pulse heating in Knight shifts; retain coupling, g-factor, multiband and orbital-limiting assumptions in critical-field comparisons. Combine symmetry-sensitive measurements with magnetic and superconducting volume evidence from the same sample. A bulk signal alone does not identify the mediating fluctuation.

Evidence: hypothesis. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Editorial inference criteria; no unique gap symmetry or pairing causation inferred.

Verification scope: Pinned chapter edited with explicit probe and source boundaries.

### scwiki-b4-claim-limits-and-disputes-1

In UTe2, Duan and colleagues reported a neutron resonance associated with antiferromagnetic wavevectors. Their extended-data comparison found no ferromagnetic signal above background in the stated measurement window. This is not absence of every possible small-momentum fluctuation at every field, energy and temperature; a resonance coupled to superconductivity also does not alone prove the direction of causation.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-df199ac9453d6985.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-limits-and-disputes-2

A study published on 29 April 2026 measured UTe2 magnetotropic response in pulsed fields up to 60 T at 4 K, where the studied superconducting phases were suppressed. It inferred enhanced transverse, near-zero-momentum susceptibility at high fields. Here transverse means perpendicular to the applied field, not an off-diagonal tensor component. These normal-state measurements differ from zero/low-field neutron conditions. The displayed 300 mK superconducting boundaries came from earlier work, and 4 K must not be recorded as this experiment's superconducting transition.

Evidence: experiment. Sources: source-15cfc4a2f9587af0.

Conditions: Source-specific temperature, pressure, field direction, frequency/momentum and sample limits; measured endpoints separated from extrapolations.

Verification scope: Selected primary abstracts/passages as detailed in references; no raw-data reproduction or full scientific acceptance.

### scwiki-b4-claim-limits-and-disputes-3

Fluctuations can enhance attraction while also renormalizing quasiparticles and affecting pair breaking. Fay–Appel's model gives a maximum followed by a decrease of calculated transition temperature toward the magnetic transition. Neither that model nor the elementary angular projection proves a universal optimum at a ferromagnetic quantum critical point. Longitudinal/transverse spectral weight, spin–orbit coupling and band structure must be specified.

Evidence: theory. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Effective ferromagnetic two-spin exchange; even-frequency single-orbital pairing; circular 2D Fermi surface a>b>0. Fay–Appel statements separately abstract-scoped.

Verification scope: Independent spin/parity/quadrature checks; not reproduction of a material calculation or measured transition.

### scwiki-b4-claim-discovery-implications-1

Treat small-momentum magnetic response as a candidate-screening observation. Test whether a proposed kernel simultaneously explains symmetry constraints, normal-state responses and field/pressure trends under matched conditions. Keep negative observations and alternative channels. The recent UTe2 comparison illustrates why distinct experiments should retain their conditions instead of being reduced to a single ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic label. Selected source passages and model checks here leave full scientific acceptance open.

Evidence: hypothesis. Sources: source-82c04c9061dbca4c.

Conditions: Editorial inference criteria; no unique gap symmetry or pairing causation inferred.

Verification scope: Pinned chapter edited with explicit probe and source boundaries.

## Revision and review

Article ID: scwiki-b4. Revision: f1debd312a212d40bd97. Updated: 2026-10-18T12:19:32.196903+00:00.

Review scope: Selected primary abstracts, Sr2RuO4/Ran manuscript passages,2021 neutron extended-data text and2026 UTe2 publisher passages; independent spin, parity and angular-projection checks.

- Full scientific acceptance, raw-data review and a comprehensive current literature survey remain open.
- Author-manuscript checks do not establish final-version equivalence; several historical references are abstract-scoped.
- Independent illustrations do not predict a material transition or establish a pairing kernel.
- UTe2 4 K is a normal-state measurement temperature, not a superconducting transition. Different field/probe windows cannot be conflated.

Source: [B_mechanisms/B4_spin_fluctuation_FM.md](https://github.com/JackZH26/jzis-superconductivity/blob/0a7c9d6696804ec26aa12f8eed68b55c9b3c0fcf/B_mechanisms/B4_spin_fluctuation_FM.md), commit 0a7c9d6696804ec26aa12f8eed68b55c9b3c0fcf, SHA-256 0440ac552dfaad93ae3a3e94517ee603ba14626f3af2745ec52dfd14479b39f7.
