{"schemaVersion":"1.0","revision":"414f1e850a9ed04cee70","note":{"id":"cuprate-interface-layer-order","title":"Cuprate interfaces: layer order and localization","summary":"Compare an interface study with a layer-selective localization experiment, while keeping measurement criteria and source access separate.","kind":"research-note-and-cross-topic-analysis","modifiedAt":"2026-10-19T00:30:35.081659+00:00","aliases":["Gozar","Logvenov","Bozovic","Božović","cuprate interface","single CuO2 plane","layer selective Zn","铜氧化物界面"],"evidenceTypes":["experiment"],"relatedCodes":["D3","D11","A1","A2","E10"],"review":{"checkedAt":"2026-10-19","scope":"Two of ten studies in the inherited series are covered here at different depths: selected Gozar author text/figures and the Logvenov original abstract. This is a partial source-note merge, not completion of the whole series.","limitations":["Author self-review, not independent scientific acceptance.","Logvenov full text and calibration remain unavailable in this review; the abstract does not justify a new quantitative material record.","Six other inherited studies still require individual primary-source review; studies 3 and 5 have separate notes. Full source-note merging is not claimed."]},"sections":[{"id":"layer-order","title":"Read layer order and criterion together","markdown":"Gozar’s author version defines I as La2CuO4, M as La1.55Sr0.45CuO4, and S as oxygen-doped La2CuO4+δ. The first letter denotes the layer nearest the substrate. Its typical resistive midpoints are approximately 15 K for I–M and 30 K for M–I; ozone-treated M–S structures reach about 50 K. These are distinct preparations.\n\nThickness and screening analyses constrain a roughly one-to-two-unit-cell interfacial region within their models. Microscopy bounds cation intermixing around one unit cell; it does not prove atomically perfect chemistry. The authors retain several possible enhancement mechanisms.","evidenceType":"experiment","sourceIds":["gozar-author-v1"],"sourceRelationship":"direct-support"},{"id":"single-plane","title":"What the single-plane abstract supports","markdown":"Logvenov and colleagues describe molecular-beam-grown metal/insulator bilayers, with each block three unit cells thick. Layer-selective Zn substitution acts as a suppressing marker; their abstract attributes the interface superconductivity to one CuO2 plane.\n\nThis is a localization inference in a heterostructure, not an isolated free-standing plane. The full methods, Zn profile and calibration have not been reviewed here. No new composition or transition-temperature record is assigned from the abstract. The publisher’s deposited editorial summary and the original abstract are also kept distinct.","evidenceType":"experiment","sourceIds":["logvenov-2009"],"sourceRelationship":"direct-support"},{"id":"compare-evidence","title":"Compare evidence without combining experiments","markdown":"An editorial comparison should retain the sample stack, treatment, observable and criterion for each result. A thickness-dependent transition, a screening model and a layer-selective perturbation answer related but different questions. A model-dependent length estimate should not be silently converted to a direct spatial image. Nor does localization alone determine the highest achievable transition temperature or select a unique pairing mechanism.\n\nPressure-quenched Hg1223 is a separate preparation problem. The [Hg1223 research note](/scwiki/library/deng-hg1223-pressure-quench) preserves its specimen histories; those results should not be entered as cuprate-interface measurements.","evidenceType":"experiment","sourceIds":["gozar-author-v1","logvenov-2009"],"sourceRelationship":"context-for-editorial-analysis"},{"id":"series-coverage","title":"What remains in the inherited series","markdown":"This note covers studies 2 and 9. Studies 3 and 5 have separate [magnetic-excitation](/scwiki/library/dean-lsco-magnetic-excitations) and [THz conductivity](/scwiki/library/bilbro-thz-fluctuation-window) notes. Superfluid-density scaling, ultrafast crystallography, proximity effects, antiferromagnetism, the superconductor–insulator transition and the plasmon study remain separate review tasks.\n\nThe repaired parsed-file directory contains curated source notes, not original-paper transcriptions. A bibliography is not a checked primary passage.","evidenceType":"experiment","sourceIds":[],"sourceRelationship":"context-for-editorial-analysis"}],"sources":[{"id":"gozar-author-v1","title":"High-temperature interface superconductivity between metallic and insulating cuprates","authors":"A. Gozar and colleagues","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.1890v1","publicationStatus":"preprint","date":"2008-10-10","dateLabel":"Author version submitted","version":"arXiv:0810.1890v1; author version of the Nature 455, 782–785 (2008) article","checkedAt":"2026-10-19","scope":"Selected pages 2–5 and captions 8–10; Figures 1–3 inspected. Final/supplement equivalence and raw-data reconstruction remain open.","doi":"10.1038/nature07293","licenseUrl":null,"licenseLabel":null},{"id":"logvenov-2009","title":"High-Temperature Superconductivity in a Single Copper-Oxygen Plane","authors":"G. Logvenov, A. Gozar and I. Bozovic","url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19900926/","publicationStatus":"journal-article","date":"2009-10-30","dateLabel":"Published in issue","version":"Science 326, 699–702; original abstract indexed by PubMed","checkedAt":"2026-10-19","scope":"Original abstract only. Crossref supplies a separate publisher editorial summary; neither is a full-methods review.","doi":"10.1126/science.1178863","licenseUrl":null,"licenseLabel":null}],"provenance":[{"path":"papers/CROSS_D3_D11_BozovicInterface.md","commit":"0a7c9d6696804ec26aa12f8eed68b55c9b3c0fcf","sha256":"8f299055adac85ea95c5dca9a35c6939305162fa1c0f36e4a8f6d58211a7be83","disposition":"partial-merge","coverage":"Interface localization and separation from pressure-quench results only. Other cited studies and cross-topic claims remain pending.","repository":"JackZH26/jzis-superconductivity"},{"path":"papers/library/Bozovic_Cuprate-Interface-Series_READING_NOTES.md","commit":"0a7c9d6696804ec26aa12f8eed68b55c9b3c0fcf","sha256":"6c0b3484dbfe9831b95e8f1ad578c2889e9c88b5e25c6954bb09160df741f0ee","disposition":"partial-merge","coverage":"Study sections 2 (Logvenov abstract) and 9 (Gozar selected author passages) only. Studies 3 and 5 have separate notes; the other six study sections remain pending.","repository":"JackZH26/jzis-superconductivity"}],"corrections":[{"issue":"Source coverage","inherited":"One series note combines ten studies and web-derived interpretation.","resolution":"Only sections 2 and 9 are represented here; section 5 has a separate note. Six studies and other CROSS claims remain pending."},{"issue":"Evidence depth","inherited":"Abstract and full-text claims can appear equally verified.","resolution":"Separate selected author passages from abstract-only localization evidence; retain the unresolved methods review."},{"issue":"Transfer of conclusions","inherited":"Interface localization treated as a general mechanism verdict.","resolution":"Keep localization, transition criteria and mechanistic interpretation separate."}],"rights":"Original concise editorial synthesis with linked sources. No paper text, figures or old parsed images are reproduced; no open redistribution license is asserted for the source articles.","revision":"5a23a286ebdf558c0da2"}}