Correlated Phase Error Bursts in a Gap-Engineered Superconducting Qubit Array
Vladislav D. Kurilovich, Gabrielle Roberts, Leigh S. Martin, Matt McEwen, Alec Eickbusch, Lara Faoro, Lev B. Ioffe, Juan Atalaya, Alexander Bilmes, John Mark Kreikebaum, Andreas Bengtsson, Paul Klimov, Matthew Neeley, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Kevin Miao, Igor L. Aleiner, Julian Kelly, Yu Chen, Kevin Satzinger, Alex Opremcak
DOI 10.1103/1bl4-b2f7 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
One of the roadblocks toward the implementation of a fault-tolerant superconducting quantum processor is impacts of ionizing radiation with the qubit substrate. Such impacts temporarily elevate the density of quasiparticles (QPs) across the device, leading to correlated qubit error bursts. The most damaging errors, T1 errors, stem from QP tunneling across the qubit Josephson junctions (JJs). Recently, we demonstrated [M. McEwen, K. Miao, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 240601 (2024)] that this type of error can be strongly suppressed by engineering the profile of superconducting gap at the JJs in a way that prevents QP tunneling. In this work, we identify a new type of impact-induced correlated error that persists in the presence of gap engineering. We observe that impacts shift the frequencies of the affected qubits, and thus lead to correlated phase errors. The frequency shifts are systematically negative, reach values up to 3 MHz, and last for ∼1 ms. We provide evidence that the shifts originate from QP-qubit interactions in the JJ region. Further, we demonstrate that the shift-induced phase errors can be detrimental to the performance of quantum error correction protocols.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interacting defects generate stochastic fluctuations in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.95J. H. Béjanin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent control of a superconducting qubit with dynamically tunable qubit-cavity coupling
similarity 0.95A. J. Hoffman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable Superconducting Qubits with Flux-Independent Coherence
similarity 0.95M. D. Hutchings et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupling a Superconducting Quantum Circuit to a Phononic Crystal Defect Cavity
similarity 0.94Patricio Arrangoiz-Arriola et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rapid High-Fidelity Single-Shot Dispersive Readout of Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.94T. Walter et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppressing charge noise decoherence in superconducting charge qubits
similarity 0.94J. A. Schreier et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified