← Back to search

Pressure and doping effects on the electronic structure and magnetism of the single-layer nickelate La2NiO4

J. B. de Vaulx, F. Bernardini, V. Olevano, Q. N. Meier, A. Cano

DOI 10.1103/94sd-ssbw · Physical Review Materials

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

La2NiO4 is a prototypical member of the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate series that offers a valuable reference point for elucidating the key ingredients behind the intriguing properties of these systems. However, the structural and electronic properties of La2NiO4 under pressure and doping remain surprisingly underexplored. Here, we investigate these properties using density-functional-theory calculations. We find that its tetragonal I4/mmm structure can be stabilized, not only under pressure, but also at ambient pressure via the partial substitution of La with Ba. In both cases, we find a pronounced magnetostructural interplay that manifests, in particular, as anomalies in the lattice-parameter evolution with composition, deviating from Vegard's law. Moreover, we show that the combined effects of Ba substitution and pressure leads to qualitative changes in the electronic structure toward the formal d7.5 configuration of the superconducting bilayer nickelates. Further, while La2NiO4 can undergo an insulator-metal transition with pressure retaining G-type antiferromagnetic order, La1.5Ba0.5NiO4 exhibits metallic behavior with an enhanced competition between different magnetic states. Our results thus offer additional insights into the interplay of structure, doping, and magnetism across the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate series.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La3Ni2O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

92Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers