Geometric Superinductance Qubits: Controlling Phase Delocalization across a Single Josephson Junction
Matilda Peruzzo, Farid Hassani, Gregory Szep, Andrea Trioni, Elena Redchenko, Martin Žemlička, Johannes M. Fink
DOI 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040341 · PRX Quantum
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
There are two elementary superconducting qubit types that derive directly from the quantum harmonic oscillator. In one, the inductor is replaced by a nonlinear Josephson junction to realize the widely used charge qubits with a compact phase variable and a discrete charge wave function. In the other, the junction is added in parallel, which gives rise to an extended phase variable, continuous wave functions, and a rich energy-level structure due to the loop topology. While the corresponding rf superconducting quantum interference device Hamiltonian was introduced as a quadratic quasi-one-dimensional potential approximation to describe the fluxonium qubit implemented with long Josephson-junction arrays, in this work we implement it directly using a linear superinductor formed by a single uninterrupted aluminum wire. We present a large variety of qubits, all stemming from the same circuit but with drastically different characteristic energy scales. This includes flux and fluxonium qubits but also the recently introduced quasicharge qubit with strongly enhanced zero-point phase fluctuations and a heavily suppressed flux dispersion. The use of a geometric inductor results in high reproducibility of the inductive energy as guaranteed by top-down lithography—a key ingredient for intrinsically protected superconducting qubits.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Decoherence in Josephson Phase Qubits from Junction Resonators
similarity 0.96R. W. Simmonds et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong Tunable Coupling between a Superconducting Charge and Phase Qubit
similarity 0.96A. Fay et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature Dependence of Coherent Oscillations in Josephson Phase Qubits
similarity 0.95J. Lisenfeld et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable Superconducting Flux Qubits with Long Coherence Times
similarity 0.95T. Chang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametric Control of a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.95S. Saito et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic topological superconductivity in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.95Barış Pekerten et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified