Localization and Mitigation of Loss in Niobium Superconducting Circuits
M. Virginia P. Altoé, Archan Banerjee, Cassidy Berk, Ahmed Hajr, Adam Schwartzberg, Chengyu Song, Mohammed Alghadeer, Shaul Aloni, Michael J. Elowson, John Mark Kreikebaum, Ed K. Wong, Sinéad M. Griffin, Saleem Rao, Alexander Weber-Bargioni, Andrew M. Minor, David I. Santiago, Stefano Cabrini, Irfan Siddiqi, D. Frank Ogletree
DOI 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020312 · PRX Quantum
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Materials imperfections in planar superconducting quantum circuits—in particular, two-level-system (TLS) defects—contribute significantly to decoherence, ultimately limiting the performance of quantum computation and sensing. The identification of specific parasitic layers and their associated loss contributions has, however, proven elusive. Using a combination of x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and analytical scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), we determine the thickness, chemical composition, and location of the oxides present in niobium-on-silicon coplanar-waveguide (CPW) resonators and quantify their respective contributions to the measured single-photon quality factor (Q). Using selective chemical etching, we reduce first the substrate-air oxide then the metal-air oxide thickness, dramatically reducing both TLS (δTLS) and non-TLS (δhi) losses, resulting in a median Q value over 5×106, with individual devices approaching 6×106. We find that silicon surface oxides host 70% of TLS losses, with a δTLS:δhi loss-density ratio near 11:1. In contrast, niobium surface oxides host 77% of non-TLS losses, uniformly distributed within the oxide layer, with a δTLS:δhi loss-density ratio of 3:4 for the superconducting circuits investigated in this work. Only 7% of losses come from other sources, including the niobium-silicon interface, which is sufficiently clean in our devices to allow epitaxial Nb nucleation on Si. As we mitigate surface losses through selective modification of the interface dielectrics, we arrive in a regime where TLS losses are no longer dominant, which will allow other types of losses in superconducting circuits to be investigated in more detail, including nonequilibrium quasiparticles.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Localization Effects on the Critical Current of a Superconductor—Normal-Metal—Superconductor Junction
similarity 0.94Hideaki Takayanagi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Niobium thin film deposition studies on copper surfaces for superconducting radio frequency cavity applications
similarity 0.94W. M. Roach et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Frequency Nonlinear Response of Superconducting Cavity-Grade Nb Surfaces
similarity 0.94Bakhrom Oripov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetization Dynamics in Proximity-Coupled Superconductor-Ferromagnet-Superconductor Multilayers
similarity 0.93I.A. Golovchanskiy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux flow properties of niobium thin films in clean and dirty superconducting limits
similarity 0.93Christophe Peroz & Catherine Villard
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic superconductivity of niobium based on its response to nonmagnetic disorder
similarity 0.93Makariy A. Tanatar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified