Two-Level-System Dynamics in a Superconducting Qubit Due to Background Ionizing Radiation
Ted Thorbeck, Andrew Eddins, Isaac Lauer, Douglas T. McClure, Malcolm Carroll
DOI 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020356 · PRX Quantum
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting qubit lifetimes must be both long and stable to provide an adequate foundation for quantum computing. This stability is imperiled by two-level systems (TLSs), currently a dominant loss mechanism, which exhibit slow spectral dynamics that destabilize qubit lifetimes on hour time scales. Stability is also threatened at millisecond time scales, where ionizing radiation has recently been found to cause bursts of correlated multiqubit decays, complicating quantum error correction. Here, we study both ionizing radiation and TLS dynamics on a 27-qubit processor, repurposing the standard transmon qubits as sensors of both radiation impacts and TLS dynamics. Unlike prior literature, we observe resilience of the qubit lifetimes to the transient quasiparticles generated by the impact of radiation. However, we also observe a new interaction between these two processes, “TLS scrambling,” in which a radiation impact causes multiple TLSs to jump in frequency, which we suggest is due to the same charge rearrangement sensed by qubits near a radiation impact. As TLS scrambling brings TLSs out of or into resonance with the qubit, the lifetime of the qubit increases or decreases. Our findings thus identify radiation as a new contribution to fluctuations in qubit lifetimes, with implications for efforts to characterize and improve device stability.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Coherent control of a superconducting qubit with dynamically tunable qubit-cavity coupling
similarity 0.95A. J. Hoffman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Coherence Hybrid Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.94Matthias Steffen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Voltage-induced thin-film superconductivity in high magnetic fields
similarity 0.93Jabir Ali Ouassou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long coherence times for Rydberg qubits on a superconducting atom chip
similarity 0.93C. Hermann-Avigliano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron Spin Resonance at the Level of 104 Spins Using Low Impedance Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.93C. Eichler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metastable Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.93Andrew J. Kerman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified