Simulation of the five-qubit quantum error correction code on superconducting qubits
I. A. Simakov, I. S. Besedin, A. V. Ustinov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032409 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Experimental realization of stabilizer-based quantum error correction (QEC) codes that would yield superior logical qubit performance is one of the formidable task for state-of-the-art quantum processors. A major obstacle toward realizing this goal is the large footprint of QEC codes, even those with a small distance. We propose a circuit based on the minimal distance-3 QEC code, which requires only five data qubits and five ancilla qubits, connected in a ring with iswap gates implemented between neighboring qubits. Using a density-matrix simulation, we show that, thanks to its smaller footprint, the proposed code has a lower logical error rate than surface-17 for similar physical error rates. We also estimate the performance of a neural-network-based error decoder, which can be trained to accommodate the error statistics of a specific quantum processor by training on experimental data.
Similar papers
Analysis of physical requirements for simple three-qubit and nine-qubit quantum error correction on quantum-dot and superconductor qubits
similarity 0.93IlKwon Sohn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Realization of an Error-Correcting Surface Code with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.90Youwei Zhao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Implementation of the three-qubit phase-flip error correction code with superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89L. Tornberg et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.1747
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hardware-Efficient Leakage-Reduction Scheme for Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.89F. Battistel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Simple quantum error detection and correction for superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88Kyle Keane & Alexander N. Korotkov · 2012 · arXiv:1205.1836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing
similarity 0.88R. Barends et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4848
Source status unknown — claims are unverified