Optimized emulation of quantum magnetometry via superconducting qubits
N. N. Gusarov, M. R. Perelshtein, P. J. Hakonen, G. S. Paraoanu
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.052609 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum magnetometry based on adaptive phase estimation allows for Heisenberg precision while avoiding creation and maintenance of complex entangled states. However, the absolute sensitivity is limited by the nonoptimal use of quantum resources provided by multiple-qubit devices and algorithmic realizations of the protocol. Here, addressing both issues, we advance the time-ascending phase estimation protocol by numerical improvements of Bayesian learning, i.e., sequential updating of the field distribution, and optimal exploitation of resources provided by unentangled qubits with limited coherence. Such algorithmic improvements are used to evaluate the absolute sensitivity both on a simulator and by pulsed-transmon experiments conducted on the IBMQ platform, where we take advantage of high coherence time. In addition, we compare the proficiency of separable and entangled states for magnetometry and show that, in practice, separable states provide superior performance. Flux-sensing emulation experiments demonstrate that a sensitivity of (0.17–1.74)μΦ0(Hz)−1 (where Φ0 is the flux quantum) for a single-qubit magnetometer and (0.06–0.65)μΦ0(Hz)−1 for a five-qubit magnetometer can be achieved for slowly oscillating 1–10kHz magnetic fields, which is comparable to more established experimental platforms for magnetometry.
Similar papers
Hybrid superconducting quantum magnetometer
similarity 0.87F. Giazotto & F. Taddei
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exploiting Dynamic Quantum Circuits in a Quantum Algorithm with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87A. D. Córcoles et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum-enhanced magnetometry by phase estimation algorithms with a single artificial atom
similarity 0.87S. Danilin et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.02230
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of quantum gates with hybrid spin-photon qubits in superconducting resonators
similarity 0.85A. Chiesa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Singlet-Triplet Superconducting Quantum Magnetometer
similarity 0.85Mohammad Alidoust et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.3230
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum simulation of macro and micro quantum phase transition from paramagnetism to frustrated magnetism with a superconducting circuit
similarity 0.84Joydip Ghosh & Barry C. Sanders · 2015 · arXiv:1506.02073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified