Dephasing due to intermode coupling in superconducting stripline resonators
Eyal Buks, Bernard Yurke
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.023815 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The nonlinearity exhibited by the kinetic inductance of a superconducting stripline couples stripline resonator modes together in a manner suitable for quantum nondemolition measurement of the number of photons in a given resonator mode. Quantum nondemolition measurement is accomplished by coherently driving another resonator mode, referred to as the detector mode, and measuring its response. We show that the sensitivity of such a detection scheme is directly related to the dephasing rate induced by such an intermode coupling. We show that high sensitivity is expected when the detector mode is driven into the nonlinear regime and operated close to a point where critical slowing down occurs.
Similar papers
Intermode dephasing in a superconducting stripline resonator
similarity 0.92Oren Suchoi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dephasing due to Intermode Coupling in Superconducting Stripline Resonators
similarity 0.91Eyal Buks & Bernard Yurke · 2005 · arXiv:quant-ph/0511033
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determining the depairing current in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
similarity 0.91S. Frasca et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intermodulation spectroscopy and the nonlinear response of two-level systems in superconducting coplanar-waveguide resonators
similarity 0.90Janka Biznárová et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity-induced dephasing of Andreev states
similarity 0.89N. I. Lundin & Y. M. Galperin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tomography and state reconstruction with superconducting single-photon detectors
similarity 0.89J. J. Renema et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified