Quantum state synthesis of superconducting resonators
Roshan Sharma, Frederick W. Strauch
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012342 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a theoretical analysis of different methods to synthesize entangled states of two quantum mechanical resonators. These methods are inspired by experimentally demonstrated interactions of superconducting resonators with artificial atoms, and offer efficient routes to generate nonclassical states. Using a two-mode Jaynes-Cummings model, we analyze the theoretical structure of these algorithms and their average performance for arbitrary states and for deterministically preparing NOON and maximally entangled states. Using a new state synthesis algorithm, we show that NOON and maximally entangled states can be prepared in a time linear in the desired photon number and without any state-selective interactions.
Similar papers
Arbitrary Control of Entanglement between two Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.95Frederick W. Strauch et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entangled State Synthesis for Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.92Frederick W. Strauch et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.5801
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Converting Quasiclassical States into Arbitrary Fock State Superpositions in a Superconducting Circuit
similarity 0.89W. Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Arbitrary Control of Entanglement between Two Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.89Frederick W. Strauch et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.4284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonant Coupling Parameter Estimation with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.89J.H. Béjanin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generalized switchable coupling for superconducting qubits using double resonance
similarity 0.89S. Ashhab et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified