Violation of noninvasive macrorealism by a superconducting qubit: Implementation of a Leggett-Garg test that addresses the clumsiness loophole
Emilie Huffman, Ari Mizel
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.032131 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Leggett-Garg inequality holds for any macrorealistic system that is being measured noninvasively. A violation of the inequality can signal that a system does not conform to our primal intuition about the physical world. Alternatively, a violation can simply indicate that a “clumsy” experimental technique led to invasive measurements. Here, we consider a recent Leggett-Garg test designed to try to rule out the mundane second possibility. We tailor this Leggett-Garg test to the IBM 5Q Quantum Experience system and find compelling evidence that qubit Q2 of the system cannot be described by noninvasive macrorealism.
Similar papers
Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality in time with weak measurement
similarity 0.83Agustin Palacios-Laloy et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preserving entanglement during weak measurement demonstrated with a violation of the Bell-Leggett-Garg inequality
similarity 0.82T. C. White et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1504.02707
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.82Zijun Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Assessing the quantumness of the annealing dynamics via Leggett Gargs inequalities: a weak measurement approach
similarity 0.81V. Vitale et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.08257
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Preparation Nonstationarity Loophole in Superconducting-Qubit Bell Tests
similarity 0.81Prosanta Pal et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.08290
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Can a noninvasive measurement of magnetic flux be performed with superconducting circuits?
similarity 0.80C. D. Tesche
Source status unknown — claims are unverified