Constrained multiobjective shape optimization of superconducting rf cavities considering robustness against geometric perturbations
Marija Kranjčević, Shahnam Gorgi Zadeh, Andreas Adelmann, Peter Arbenz, Ursula van Rienen
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.122001 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
High current storage rings, such as the Z-pole operating mode of the FCC-ee, require accelerating cavities that are optimized with respect to both the fundamental mode and the higher order modes. Furthermore, the cavity shape needs to be robust against geometric perturbations which could, for example, arise from manufacturing inaccuracies or harsh operating conditions at cryogenic temperatures. This leads to a constrained multiobjective shape optimization problem which is computationally expensive even for axisymmetric cavity shapes. In order to decrease the computation cost, a global sensitivity analysis is performed and its results are used to reduce the search space and redefine the objective functions. A massively parallel implementation of an evolutionary algorithm, combined with a fast axisymmetric Maxwell eigensolver and a frequency-tuning method is used to find an approximation of the Pareto front. The computed Pareto front approximation and a cavity shape with desired properties are shown. Further, the approach is generalized and applied to another type of cavity.
Similar papers
Systematical study on superconducting radio frequency elliptic cavity shapes applicable to future high energy accelerators and energy recovery linacs
similarity 0.89Valery Shemelin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resilient superconducting-element design with genetic algorithms
similarity 0.86F.A. Cárdenas-López et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of geometry on flux trapping and the related surface resistance in a superconducting cavity
similarity 0.84Felix Kramer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An efficient scheme to optimize the superconducting levitation via genetic algorithm
similarity 0.83Chang-Qing Ye et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.03558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hamiltonian Extrema of an Arbitrary Flux-Biased Josephson Circuit
similarity 0.83A. Miano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multipactor simulations in superconducting cavities and power couplers
similarity 0.82G. Devanz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified