Superconducting radio-frequency cavity fault classification using machine learning at Jefferson Laboratory
Chris Tennant, Adam Carpenter, Tom Powers, Anna Shabalina Solopova, Lasitha Vidyaratne, Khan Iftekharuddin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.114601 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on the development of machine learning models for classifying C100 superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavity faults in the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Lab. CEBAF is a continuous-wave recirculating linac utilizing 418 SRF cavities to accelerate electrons up to 12 GeV through five passes. Of these, 96 cavities (12 cryomodules) are designed with a digital low-level rf system configured such that a cavity fault triggers waveform recordings of 17 rf signals for each of the eight cavities in the cryomodule. Subject matter experts are able to analyze the collected time-series data and identify which of the eight cavities faulted first and classify the type of fault. This information is used to find trends and strategically deploy mitigations to problematic cryomodules. However, manually labeling the data is laborious and time consuming. By leveraging machine learning, near real-time—rather than postmortem—identification of the offending cavity and classification of the fault type has been implemented. We discuss performance of the machine learning models during a recent physics run. Results show the cavity identification and fault classification models have accuracies of 84.9% and 78.2%, respectively.
Similar papers
Method for in situ and in operando cavity loaded Q extraction in superconducting rf accelerators
similarity 0.84Frank Marhauser
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A longitudinal study of field emission in CEBAF's SRF cavities 1995-2015
similarity 0.84Jay Benesch · 2015 · arXiv:1502.06877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Data-driven gradient optimization for field emission management in a superconducting radio-frequency linac
similarity 0.84S. Goldenberg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Continuous wave superconducting radio frequency electron linac for nuclear physics research
similarity 0.84Charles E. Reece
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum-Tailored Machine-Learning Characterization of a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.81Élie Genois et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source superconducting rf linac availability performance and demonstration of operation restoration with superconducting rf cavity off
similarity 0.81V. S. Morozov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified