Regenerative multibunch beam breakup instabilities and countermeasures for a high-intensity electron accelerator and the superconducting Darmstadt linear electron accelerator
Sergei Glukhov, Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, Michaela Arnold, Christian Stoll
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.024402 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Regenerative multibunch beam breakup instabilities are a well-known phenomenon in recirculating linacs where particle bunches pass multiple times through the same superconducting rf cavities with extremely high quality factor. This is in particular true for energy recovery linacs. Parasitic electromagnetic modes excited in the cavities can affect bunch dynamics in such a way, that on its subsequent passes it excites the modes further and a positive feedback loop is formed. Direct bunch tracking and a stability analysis technique can be used to study the instability. Usually only dipole modes are considered. In the present work, similar approaches are applied to monopole and quadrupole modes and illustrated with simulation results for the S-DALINAC and MESA facilities. An approximated stability analysis technique with better performance for the case of multiple recirculations is proposed. Countermeasures including betatron phase advance adjustment and additional betatron coupling are considered and a universal criterion for assessment of their effectiveness is proposed. A simple model of a damped oscillator with feedback is proposed as a universal example illustrating the phenomenon in general.
Similar papers
Beam simulations with initial bunch noise in superconducting rf proton linacs
similarity 0.86J. Tückmantel
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multipactor simulations in superconducting cavities and power couplers
similarity 0.84G. Devanz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic compensation of an rf cavity failure in a superconducting linac
similarity 0.83Jean-Luc Biarrotte & Didier Uriot
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preaccelerator concepts for an energy-recovering superconducting accelerator
similarity 0.82Robert Heine
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Alternate phase focusing in sequence of independent phased resonators as superconducting linac boosters
similarity 0.82S. Dechoudhury & Alok Chakrabarti
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Separatrix formalism for superconducting linear accelerators
similarity 0.82Yu. Senichev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified