Commissioning and optimization of superconducting undulator in the horizontal state
Zilin Chen, Xiangchen Yang, Xiangzhen Zhang, Junhao Wei, Xiaojuan Bian, Jieru Geng, Yao Gao, Yuhui Li
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.022401 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Taking advantage of a higher field than a conventional permanent magnet undulator, superconducting undulators (SCUs) have been rapidly developed in recent years for applications at synchrotron radiation sources and free-electron lasers. The Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, has developed a 1.5-m long planar SCU with a short period of 15 mm. This SCU has been commissioned and optimized in the horizontal position. In contrast to the vertical position, where the undulator coils are immersed in liquid helium for superconductivity, the horizontal test requires the assembly of the complete device, including the cryostat, current conductor, cryocooler, vacuum chamber, and undulator coils. This test reflects the operation status and measures the SCU’s characteristics under working conditions. Although experiences from the vertical test provided good guidance for horizontal optimization, special care needs to be taken for effects such as gravity. After improving field uniformity through iterative measurements, the rms phase error of the SCU is reduced to 7.3° at a current of 400 A. Additionally, the functions of the end correction coils to mitigate field integral errors have been verified. This paper also demonstrates and analyzes other phenomena and interesting observations during the commissioning process. It discusses important issues that impact field quality and measurement accuracy and suggests further improvement measures for an even better field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbTi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Characterization and long term operation of a novel superconducting undulator with 15 mm period length in a synchrotron light source
similarity 0.96S. Casalbuoni et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vibration-induced field fluctuations in a superconducting magnet
similarity 0.94J. W. Britton et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of persistent current effects in the RHIC superconducting magnets
similarity 0.93C. Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic design of superconducting quadrupoles
similarity 0.93L. Rossi & E. Todesco
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement Purification and Protection in a Superconducting Quantum Network
similarity 0.92Haoxiong Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Calculation of persistent currents in superconducting magnets
similarity 0.92C. Völlinger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified