Mitigation of the Magnetic Field Susceptibility of Transition-Edge Sensors Using a Superconducting Groundplane
M. de Wit, L. Gottardi, M.L. Ridder, K. Nagayoshi, E. Taralli, H. Akamatsu, D. Vaccaro, J.-W.A. den Herder, M.P. Bruijn, J.R. Gao
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024066 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Transition-edge-sensor (TES) microcalorimeters and bolometers are used for a variety of applications. The sensors are based on the steep temperature-dependent resistance of the normal-to-superconducting transition, and are thus intrinsically sensitive to magnetic fields. Conventionally the detectors are shielded from stray magnetic fields using external magnetic shields. However, in particular for applications with strict limits on the available space and mass of an instrument, external magnetic shields might not be enough to obtain the required shielding factors or field homogeneity. Additionally, these shields are only effective for magnetic fields generated external to the TES array, and are ineffective to mitigate the impact of internally generated magnetic fields. Here we present an alternative shielding method based on a superconducting groundplane deposited directly on the backside of the silicon nitride membrane on which the TESs are located. We demonstrate that this local shielding for external magnetic fields has a shielding factor of at the least approximately 80, and is also effective at reducing internal self-induced magnetic fields, as demonstrated by measurements and simulation of the eddy current losses in our ac-biased detectors. Measurements of 5.9-keV x-ray photons show that our shielded detectors have a high resilience to external magnetic fields, showing no degradation of the energy resolution or shifts of the energy-scale calibration for fields of several microtesla, values higher than expected in typical real-world applications.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti/Au Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.093 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ti/Au Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.096 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Altering the Superconductor Transition Temperature by Domain-Wall Arrangements in Hybrid Ferromagnet-Superconductor Structures
similarity 0.95L. Y. Zhu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Deeper insight into the terahertz response of conventional superconductors under magnetic field
similarity 0.95M. Šindler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of superconductivity on near-field radiative heat transfer
similarity 0.94Tomáš Králík et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and electrical properties in single-crystalline ultrathin Nb films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy
similarity 0.94K. Yoshii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoinduced time-resolved electrodynamics of superconducting metals and alloys
similarity 0.94R. P. S. M. Lobo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancements of pinning by superconducting nanoarrays
similarity 0.94E. Navarro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified