Ground-state-energy calculation for the water molecule on a superconducting quantum processor
Michael A. Jones, Harish J. Vallury, Lloyd C.L. Hollenberg
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.064017 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The accurate computation of properties of large molecular systems is classically infeasible and is one of the applications in which it is hoped that quantum computers will demonstrate an advantage over classical devices. However, due to the limitations of present-day quantum hardware, variational-hybrid algorithms introduced to tackle these problems struggle to meet the accuracy and precision requirements of chemical applications. Here, we apply the quantum computed moments (QCM) approach combined with a variety of noise-mitigation techniques to an eight qubit and spin-orbital representation of the water molecule (H2O). A noise-stable improvement on the variational result for a four-excitation trial state (circuit depth 25, 22 cz gates) was obtained, with the ground-state energy computed to be within 1.0±0.8 mHa of exact diagonalization in the 14 spin-orbital basis. Thus, the QCM approach, despite an increased number of measurements and noisy quantum hardware (cz error rates c.0.3% corresponding to expected error rates on the trial-state circuit of order 7%), is able to determine the ground-state energy of a nontrivial molecular system at the required accuracy (c.0.05%). To the best of our knowledge, these results are the largest calculations performed on a physical quantum computer to date to achieve millihartree agreement with exact diagonalization, and a promising indicator of how such hybrid approaches might scale to problems of interest in the low-error and fault-tolerant regimes as quantum computers develop.
Similar papers
Statistical Phase Estimation and Error Mitigation on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
similarity 0.84Nick S. Blunt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
10-Qubit Entanglement and Parallel Logic Operations with a Superconducting Circuit
similarity 0.84Chao Song et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards Studying Superconductivity in the Fermi-Hubbard Model on Rydberg Atoms
similarity 0.83Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz & Nora M. Bauer · 2026 · arXiv:2603.06529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-Tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.83Jerry M. Chow et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing
similarity 0.83R. Barends et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4848
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of control in a superconducting qutrit using randomized benchmarking
similarity 0.82M. Kononenko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified