Phase stiffness in an antiferromagnetic superconductor
Walter Metzner, Hiroyuki Yamase
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.014504 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the suppression of the phase stiffness in a superconductor by antiferromagnetic order. The analysis is based on a general expression for the phase stiffness in a mean-field state with coexisting spin-singlet superconductivity and spiral magnetism. Néel order is included as a special case. Close to half filling, where the pairing gap is much smaller than the magnetic gap, a simple formula for the phase stiffness in terms of magnetic quasiparticle bands is derived. The phase stiffness is determined by charge carriers in small electron or hole pockets in this regime. The general analysis is complemented by a numerical calculation for the two-dimensional Hubbard model with nearest- and next-to-nearest-neighbor hopping amplitudes at a moderate interaction strength. The resulting phase stiffness exhibits a striking electron-hole asymmetry. In the ground state, it is larger than the pairing gap on the hole-doped side and smaller for electron doping. Hence, in the hole-doped regime near half filling, the ground-state pairing gap sets the scale for the Kosterlitz-Thouless temperature TcKT, while in the slightly electron-doped regime, TcKT is determined essentially by the ground-state phase stiffness.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Redistribution of phase fluctuations in a periodically driven cuprate superconductor
similarity 0.98R. Höppner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic dynamics of bilayer cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.98Amit Pratap et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiphase Fermi-surface modulations accompanying displacement excitation in a parent compound of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.97Kozo Okazaki et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of thermal phase fluctuations on the spectral function for a two-dimensional d-wave superconductor
similarity 0.97M. Khodas & A. M. Tsvelik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Toward a unified magnetic phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.97Alexander Sokol & David Pines
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic mechanism for magnetothermal conductivity oscillations in spin-orbit-coupled nodal superconductors
similarity 0.97W. A. Atkinson & A. P. Kampf
Source status unknown — claims are unverified