← Back to search

Superconducting gap anisotropy and topological singularities due to lattice translational symmetry and their thermodynamic signatures

Bastian Zinkl, Mark H. Fischer, Manfred Sigrist

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.014519 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Symmetry arguments based on the point group of a system and thermodynamic measurements are often combined to identify the order parameter in unconventional superconductors. However, lattice translations, which can induce additional momenta with vanishing order parameter in the Brillouin zone, are neglected, especially in gap functions otherwise expected to be constant, such as in chiral superconductors. After a general analysis of the symmetry conditions for vanishing gap functions, we study the case of chiral p- and chiral f-wave pairing on a square lattice, a situation relevant for Sr2RuO4. Specifically, we calculate the impurity-induced density of states, specific heat, superfluid density, and thermal conductivity employing a self-consistent T-matrix calculation and compare our results to the case of a nodal (d-wave) order parameter. While there is a clear distinction between a fully gapped chiral state and a nodal state, the strongly anisotropic case is almost indistinguishable from the nodal case. Our findings illustrate the difficulty of interpreting thermodynamic measurements. In particular, we find that the available measurements are consistent with a chiral (f-wave) order parameter. Our results help to reconcile the thermodynamic measurements with the overall picture of chiral spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers