← Back to search

Properties of the H−T phase diagram of the 3−K phase in eutectic Sr2RuO4-Ru: Evidence for chiral superconductivity

Hirono Kaneyasu, Yuya Enokida, Takuji Nomura, Yasumasa Hasegawa, Toru Sakai, Manfred Sigrist

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.214501 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We use the Ginzburg-Landau theory for a chiral p-wave superconductor to describe the filamentary superconducting phase nucleating at temperatures higher than the bulk transition temperature near the interfaces between Ru metal and Sr2RuO4 in eutectic Sr2RuO4-Ru. The peculiar phase diagram of magnetic field versus temperature shows very distinct properties for different directions of the magnetic field. A clear feature of the magnetic fields in the basal plane of Sr2RuO4, perpendicular to the chiral axis (c axis), is the occurrence of a second superconducting transition with a new order parameter visible as a zero-bias anomaly in tunneling spectroscopy. For the field along the c axis of Sr2RuO4, two transitions merge, indicating that the field drives the second-order parameter through the paramagnetic coupling to a chiral supercurrent. The resulting phenomenology shows that the assumption of a chiral superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 yields an image reproducing the qualitative properties observed in the experiment. This discussion is qualitatively analogous to the corresponding chiral even- and odd-parity channels.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.5Pressure not reportedonset
Sr2RuO4-Ru

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers