Fractionalized pair density wave in the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors
D. Chakraborty, M. Grandadam, M. H. Hamidian, J. C. S. Davis, Y. Sidis, C. Pépin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224511 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The mysterious pseudogap (PG) phase of cuprate superconductors has been the subject of intense investigation over the last 30 years, but without a clear agreement about its origin. Owing to a recent observation in Raman spectroscopy, of a precursor in the charge channel, on top of the well known fact of a precursor in the superconducting channel, we present here a novel idea: the PG is formed through a Higgs mechanism, where two kinds of preformed pairs, in the particle-particle and particle-hole channels, become entangled through a freezing of their global phase. Remarkably, this entanglement is equivalent to fractionalizing a Cooper pair density wave (PDW) into its elementary parts; the particle-hole pair, giving rise to both density modulations and current modulations, and the particle-particle counterpart, leading to the formation of Cooper pairs. From this perspective, the “fractionalized PDW” becomes the central object around the formation of the pseudogap. The “locking” of phases between the charge and superconducting modes gives a unique explanation for the unusual global phase coherence of short-range charge modulations, observed below Tc on phase sensitive scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). A simple microscopic model enables us to estimate the mean-field values of the precursor gaps in each channel and the PG energy scale, and to compare them to the values observed in Raman scattering spectroscopy. We also discuss the possibility of a multiplicity of orders in the PG phase and give an overview of the phase diagram.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pair density waves in superconducting vortex halos
similarity 0.97Yuxuan Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical model-solution to the competition between a pseudogap phase and a charge-transfer-gap phase in high-temperature cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.97Tanmoy Das et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Redistribution of phase fluctuations in a periodically driven cuprate superconductor
similarity 0.97R. Höppner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of weak pseudogap behavior in the underdoped cuprate superconductors: General theory and quasiparticle properties
similarity 0.97Jörg Schmalian et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observability of Quantum Phase Fluctuations in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.97Hyok-Jon Kwon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle mirages in the tunneling spectra of d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.96I. Paul et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified