Magnetic signatures of domain walls in s+is and s+id superconductors: Observability and what that can tell us about the superconducting order parameter
Andrea Benfenati, Mats Barkman, Thomas Winyard, Alex Wormald, Martin Speight, Egor Babaev
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.054507 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
One of the defining features of spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry (BTRS) is the existence of domain walls, the detection of which would be strong evidence for such systems. There is keen interest in BTRS currently, in part, due to recent muon spin rotation experiments, which have pointed towards Ba1−xKxFe2As2 exhibiting a remarkable case of s-wave superconductivity with spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry. A key question, however, is how to differentiate between the different theoretical models which describe such a state. Two particularly popular choices of model are s+is and s+id superconducting states. In this paper, we obtain solutions for domain walls in s+is and s+id systems, including the effects of lattice anisotropies. We show that, in general, both models exhibit spontaneous magnetic fields that extend along the entire length of the domain wall. We demonstrate the qualitative difference between the magnetic signatures of s+is and s+id domain walls and propose a procedure to extract the superconducting pairing symmetry from the magnetic-field response of domain walls.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic signatures of domain walls in and superconductors: observability and what that can tell us about the superconducting order parameter
similarity 0.95Andrea Benfenati et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.07969
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
s+is superconductivity with incipient bands: Doping dependence and STM signatures
similarity 0.95Jakob Böker et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Short-time dynamics in s+is-wave superconductor with incipient bands
similarity 0.95Marvin A. Müller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinguishing between s+id and s+is pairing symmetries in multiband superconductors through spontaneous magnetization pattern induced by a defect
similarity 0.94Shi-Zeng Lin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Singular ground state of multiband inhomogeneous superconductors
similarity 0.94Yu. N. Ovchinnikov & D. V. Efremov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting state coexisting with a phase-separated static magnetic order in (Ba,K)Fe2As2, (Sr,Na)Fe2As2, and CaFe2As2
similarity 0.93T. Goko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified