Deficiency of the scaling collapse as an indicator of a superconductor-insulator quantum phase transition
Andrey Rogachev, Benjamin Sacépé
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235164 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Finite-size scaling analysis is a well-accepted method for identification and characterization of quantum phase transitions (QPTs) in superconducting, magnetic, and insulating systems. We formally apply this analysis in the form suitable for QPTs in two-dimensional (2D) superconducting films to magnetic-field-driven superconductor-metal transition in one-dimensional (1D) MoGe nanowires. Despite being obviously inapplicable to nanowires, the 2D scaling equation leads to a high-quality scaling collapse of the nanowire resistance in the temperature and resistance ranges comparable or better to what is accepted in the analysis of the films. Our results suggest that the appearance and the quality of the scaling collapse by itself is not a definitive indicator of a QPT. We have also observed a sign change of the zero-bias anomaly (ZBA) in the nonlinear resistance, occurring exactly at the critical field of the accidental QPT. This behavior is often taken as an additional confirmation of the transition. We argue that in nanowires, the nonlinearity is caused by electron heating and has no relation to the critical fluctuations. Our observation suggests that similar to the scaling collapse, the sign change of ZBA can be a misleading indicator of QPT.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo78Ge22 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo50Ge50 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Deficiency of the scaling collapse as an indicator of a superconductor-insulator quantum phase transition
similarity 1.00Andrey Rogachev & Benjamin Sacépé · 2020 · arXiv:2003.13157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase slips in superconducting films with constrictions
similarity 0.90Sang L. Chu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermally assisted vortex motion in coupled two-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.90W. R. White et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of hexagonal patterned arrays and defect geometry on the critical current of superconducting films
similarity 0.89I. A. Sadovskyy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor Insulator Transition in Long MoGe Nanowires
similarity 0.89Hyunjeong Kim et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.3333
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex instability in molybdenum-germanium superconducting films
similarity 0.89Manlai Liang & Milind N. Kunchur
Source status unknown — claims are unverified