Stiffnessometer: A magnetic-field-free superconducting stiffness meter and its application
Itay Mangel, Itzik Kapon, Nitzan Blau, Katrine Golubkov, Nir Gavish, Amit Keren
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We provide a detailed account for a method to measure superconducting stiffness ρs, critical current density jc, and coherence length ξ, in one apparatus, without subjecting the sample to magnetic field or attaching leads. The method is based on the London equation j=−ρsA, where j is the current density and A is the vector potential. Using a rotor free A and a measurement of j via the magnetic moment of a superconducting ring, we determine ρs. By increasing A until the London equation fails we determine jc and ξ. The method is sensitive to very small stiffness, which translates to penetration depth λ≲1 mm. It is also sensitive to low critical current density jc∼103Amm−2 or long coherence length ξ∼1μm. Naturally the method does not suffer from demagnetization factor complications, the presence of vortices, or out-of-equilibrium conditions. Therefore, the absolute values of the different parameters can be determined. We demonstrate the application of this method to La2−xSrxCuO4 with x=0.17.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Light-induced nonequilibrium response of the superconducting cuprate La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.94Hiroaki Niwa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermomagnetic hysteretic properties resembling superconductivity in the normal state of La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
similarity 0.94M. Majoros et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex fluctuations in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4+δ
similarity 0.94Yung M. Huh & D. K. Finnemore
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism and superconductivity in doped La2CuO4
similarity 0.93M. Oda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Quantum Spin Disorder in Cuprates
similarity 0.93Moshe Havilio & Assa Auerbach
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of the Hall Coefficient and the Peculiar Electronic Structure of the Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.93Yoichi Ando et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified