← Back to search

High-temperature conventional superconductivity in the boron-carbon system: Material trends

Santanu Saha, Simone Di Cataldo, Maximilian Amsler, Wolfgang von der Linden, Lilia Boeri

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024519 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In this paper, we probe the possibility of high-temperature conventional superconductivity in the boron-carbon system, using ab initio screening. A database of 320 metastable structures with fixed composition (50%/50%) is generated with the minima hopping method, and characterized with electronic and vibrational descriptors. Full electron-phonon calculations on 16 representative structures allow us to identify general trends in Tc across and within the four families in the energy landscape, and to construct an approximate Tc predictor, based on transparently interpretable and easily computable electronic and vibrational descriptors. Based on these, we estimate that around 10% of all metallic structures should exhibit Tc's above 30 K. This paper is a first step toward ab initio design of new high-Tc superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BC

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

39Pressure unresolvedunknown
H3S

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

203200 GPaunknown
LaH10

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

265Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers