Inversion in a four-terminal superconducting device on the quartet line. I. Two-dimensional metal and the quartet beam splitter
Régis Mélin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.245435 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In connection with the recent Harvard group experiment on graphene-based four-terminal Josephson junctions containing a grounded loop, we consider voltage biasing at opposite voltages on the quartet line and establish lowest-order perturbation theory in the tunnel amplitudes between a two-dimensional (2D) metal and four superconducting leads in the dirty limit. We present in addition general nonperturbative and nonadiabatic results. The critical current on the quartet line Ic(Φ/Φ0) depends on the reduced flux Φ/Φ0 via interference between the three-terminal quartets (3TQs) and the nonstandard four-terminal split quartets (4TSQs). The 4TSQs result from synchronizing two Josephson junctions by exchange of two quasiparticles “surfing” on the 2D quantum wake, and this mechanism is already operational at equilibrium. Perturbation theory in the tunnel amplitudes shows that the 3TQs are π-shifted but the 4TSQs are 0-shifted if the contacts have linear dimension which is large compared to the elastic mean free path. We establish the gate voltage dependence of the quartet critical current oscillations Ic(Φ/Φ0). It is argued that “observation of Ic(0)≠Ic(1/2)” implies “evidence for the four-terminal 4TSQ” for finite bias voltage on the quartet line and arbitrary interface transparencies. This statement relies on physically motivated approximations leading to the Ambegaokar-Baratoff-type formula for the quartet critical current-flux relation. It is concluded that the recent experiment mentioned above finds evidence for the four-terminal 4TSQ.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Inversion in a four-terminal superconducting device on the quartet line: I. Two-dimensional metal and the quartet beam splitter
similarity 0.94Régis Mélin · 2020 · arXiv:2008.01981
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a mesoscopic superconducting system
similarity 0.93K. Wrześniewski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parity switching in a full-shell superconductor-semiconductor nanowire qubit
similarity 0.93O. Erlandsson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium spin transport in Zeeman-split superconductors
similarity 0.93Tatiana Krishtop et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle Relaxation of Superconducting Qubits in the Presence of Flux
similarity 0.93G. Catelani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multilevel spectroscopy of two-level systems coupled to a dc SQUID phase qubit
similarity 0.93T. A. Palomaki et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified