Anisotropic dressing of electrons in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
Shuning Tan, Yiqun Liu, Yingping Mou, Shiping Feng
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.014503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent experiments revealed a remarkable possibility for the absence of the disparity between the phase diagrams of electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors, while such an aspect should also be reflected in the dressing of the electrons. Here the phase diagrams of electron-doped cuprate superconductors and the related exotic features of the anisotropic dressing of the electrons are studied based on kinetic-energy-driven superconductivity. It is shown that although the optimized Tc in the electron-doped side is much smaller than that in the hole-doped case, the electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors rather resemble each other in the doping range of the superconducting dome, indicating an absence of the disparity between the phase diagrams of electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors. In particular, the anisotropic dressing of the electrons due to strong electron coupling to strongly dispersive spin excitation leads to the truncation of the electron Fermi surface to form the disconnected Fermi arcs centered around the nodal region. Concomitantly, the dip in the peak-dip-hump structure of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum is directly associated with the corresponding peak in the quasiparticle scattering rate, while the dispersion kink is always accompanied by the corresponding inflection point in the total self-energy as the dip in the peak-dip-hump structure and the dispersion kink in the hole-doped counterparts. The theory also predicts that both normal and anomalous self-energies exhibit well-pronounced low-energy peak structures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Influence of hole doping on spin dynamics in lightly doped copper oxide superconductors
similarity 0.97F. P. Onufrieva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Asymmetry of superconductivity in hole- and electron-doped cuprates: Explanation within two-particle self-consistent analysis for the three-band model
similarity 0.96Daisuke Ogura & Kazuhiko Kuroki
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and partial violation of spin correlation in electron stripes
similarity 0.96S. Kuwata
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning the in-plane electron behavior in high-Tc cuprate superconductors via apical atoms: A first-principles Wannier-states analysis
similarity 0.96Wei-Guo Yin & Wei Ku
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum depinning of vortices in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.96Gianni Blatter et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between superconductivity and altermagnetism in disordered materials and heterostructures
similarity 0.96Rodrigo de las Heras et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified