Topological superconductivity in nanowires proximate to a diffusive superconductor–magnetic-insulator bilayer
Aleksei Khindanov, Jason Alicea, Patrick Lee, William S. Cole, Andrey E. Antipov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.134506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study semiconductor nanowires coupled to a bilayer of a disordered superconductor and a magnetic insulator, motivated by recent experiments reporting possible Majorana-zero-mode signatures in related architectures. Specifically, we pursue a quasiclassical Usadel equation approach that treats superconductivity in the bilayer self-consistently in the presence of spin-orbit scattering, magnetic-impurity scattering, and Zeeman splitting induced by both the magnetic insulator and a supplemental applied field. Within this framework we explore prospects for engineering topological superconductivity in a nanowire proximate to the bilayer. We find that a magnetic-insulator-induced Zeeman splitting, mediated through the superconductor alone, cannot induce a topological phase since the destruction of superconductivity (i.e., Clogston limit) preempts the required regime in which the nanowire's Zeeman energy exceeds the induced pairing strength. However, this Zeeman splitting does reduce the critical applied field needed to access the topological phase transition, with fields antiparallel to the magnetization of the magnetic insulator having an optimal effect. Finally, we show that magnetic-impurity scattering degrades the topological phase, and spin-orbit scattering, if present in the superconductor, pushes the Clogston limit to higher fields yet simultaneously increases the critical applied field strength.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Unified numerical approach to topological semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures
similarity 0.96Georg W. Winkler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-quantum-discretized dynamics of magnetic flux entry, exit, and annihilation in current-driven mesoscopic type-I superconductors
similarity 0.96G. R. Berdiyorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of surface p-wave superconductivity in disordered topological insulators
similarity 0.96G. Tkachov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-organized topological state in a magnetic chain on the surface of a superconductor
similarity 0.95I. Reis et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of a bulk superconducting environment on the superconductivity of one-dimensional zinc nanowires
similarity 0.95Mingliang Tian et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics and energy distribution of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.95K. Segall et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified