Microscopic derivation of superconductor-insulator boundary conditions for Ginzburg-Landau theory revisited: Enhanced superconductivity at boundaries with and without magnetic field
Albert Samoilenka, Egor Babaev
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.224516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using the standard Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory, we revise microscopic derivation of the superconductor-insulator boundary conditions for the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model. We obtain a negative contribution to free energy in the form of surface integral. Boundary conditions for the conventional superconductor have the form n·∇ψ=constψ. These are shown to follow from considering the order parameter reflected in the boundary. The boundary conditions are also derived for more general GL models with higher-order derivatives and pair-density-wave states. It shows that the boundary states with higher critical temperature and the boundary gap enhancement, found recently in BCS theory, are also present in microscopically derived GL theory. In the case of an applied external field, we show that the third critical magnetic-field value Hc3 is higher than what follows from the de Gennes boundary conditions and is also significant in type-I regime.
Similar papers
Microscopic derivation of superconductor-insulator boundary conditions for Ginzburg-Landau theory revisited. Enhanced superconductivity at boundaries with and without magnetic field
similarity 0.92Albert Samoilenka & Egor Babaev · 2020 · arXiv:2011.09519
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boundary condition for Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconducting layers
similarity 0.91Jan Koláček et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extended Ginzburg-Landau formalism: systematic expansion in small deviation from the critical temperature
similarity 0.91A. V. Vagov et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.4772
Source status unknown — claims are unverified