Two superconductor-insulator phase transitions in the spinel oxide Li1±xTi2O4−δ induced by ionic liquid gating
Zhongxu Wei, Qian Li, Ben-Chao Gong, Xinjian Wei, Wei Hu, Zhuang Ni, Ge He, Mingyang Qin, Anna Kusmartseva, Fedor V. Kusmartsev, Jie Yuan, Beiyi Zhu, Qihong Chen, Jian-Hao Chen, Kai Liu, Kui Jin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L140501 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The associations between emergent physical phenomena (e.g., superconductivity) and orbital, charge, and spin degrees of freedom of 3d electrons are intriguing in transition metal compounds. Here, we successfully manipulate the superconductivity of spinel oxide Li1±xTi2O4−δ (LTO) by ionic liquid gating. A dome-shaped superconducting phase diagram is established, where two insulating phases are disclosed both in heavily electron-doping and hole-doping regions. The superconductor-insulator transition (SIT) in the hole-doping region can be attributed to the loss of Ti valence electrons. In the electron-doping region, LTO exhibits an unexpected SIT instead of a metallic behavior despite an increase in carrier density. Furthermore, a thermal hysteresis is observed in the normal state resistance curve, suggesting a first-order phase transition. We speculate that the SIT and the thermal hysteresis stem from the enhanced 3d electron correlations and the formation of orbital ordering by comparing the transport and structural results of LTO with the other spinel oxide superconductor MgTi2O4 (MTO), as well as analyzing the electronic structure by first-principles calculations. Further comprehension of the detailed interplay between superconductivity and orbital ordering would contribute to the revealing of unconventional superconducting pairing mechanism.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li1±xTi2O4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiTi2O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgTi2O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ionic liquid gating induced two superconductor-insulator phase transitions in spinel oxide LiTiO
similarity 0.90Zhongxu Wei et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.03518
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate-tuned Superconductor-Insulator transition in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe
similarity 0.88B. Lei et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1503.02457
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate-tuned superconductor-insulator transition in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe
similarity 0.87B. Lei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supersolid Phases of a Doped Valence-Bond Quantum Antiferromagnet: Evidence for a Coexisting Superconducting Order Parameter
similarity 0.87Marcin Raczkowski & Didier Poilblanc
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of weak superconductivity at the room-temperature grown LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface
similarity 0.86G. E. D. K. Prawiroatmodjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
−76Li isotope effect in superconducting LiTi2O4
similarity 0.86R. G. Goodrich
Source status unknown — claims are unverified