RKKY interaction in a spin-split superconductor
Atousa Ghanbari, Jacob Linder
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094527 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We determine theoretically the interaction between two magnetic impurities embedded in a spin-split s-wave superconductor. The spin-splitting in the superconductor gives rise to two different interaction types between the impurity spins, depending on whether their spins lie in the plane perpendicular to the spin-splitting field (Heisenberg) or not (Ising). For impurity separation distances exceeding ξS, we find that the magnitude of the spin-splitting can determine whether an antiferromagnetic or ferromagnetic alignment of the impurity spins is preferred by the RKKY interaction. Moreover, the Ising and Heisenberg terms of the RKKY interaction alternate on being the dominant term and their magnitudes oscillate as a function of distance between the impurities.
Similar papers
RKKY interaction at helical edges of topological superconductors
similarity 0.93Katharina Laubscher et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
RKKY interaction in a spin-split superconductor
similarity 0.92Atousa Ghanbari & Jacob Linder · 2021 · arXiv:2105.04576
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing magnetic and triplet correlations in spin-split superconductors with magnetic impurities
similarity 0.92C.-H. Huang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Magnetic and Triplet Correlations in Spin-Split Superconductors with Magnetic Impurities
similarity 0.92Chen-How Huang et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.07184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
RKKY interaction in SDW phase of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.91Alireza Akbari et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.4643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
RKKY interaction on surfaces of topological insulators with superconducting proximity effect
similarity 0.90Alexander A. Zyuzin & Daniel Loss
Source status unknown — claims are unverified