Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2
Di S. Wei, David Saykin, Oliver Y. Miller, Sheng Ran, Shanta R. Saha, Daniel F. Agterberg, Jörg Schmalian, Nicholas P. Butch, Johnpierre Paglione, Aharon Kapitulnik
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.024521 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) in UTe2 was inferred from observations of a spontaneous Kerr response in the superconducting state after cooling in zero magnetic field, while a finite c-axis magnetic field training was further used to determine the nature of the nonunitary composite order parameter of this material. Here, we present an extensive study of the magnetic-field-trained Kerr effect, which unveils a unique critical state of pinned “ferromagnetic vortices.” We show that a remanent Kerr signal appears following the removal of a training magnetic field, which reflects the response to the TRSB order parameter and the external magnetic field through the paramagnetic susceptibility. This unambiguously demonstrates the importance of the magnetic fluctuations and their intimate relation to the composite order parameter. Focusing the beam on the center of the sample, we are able to accurately determine the maximum field that is screened by the critical state and the respective critical current. Measurements in the presence of magnetic field show the tendency of the superconductor to produce shielding currents that oppose the increase in vortex-induced magnetization due to the diverging paramagnetic susceptibility.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.55 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.55 | 1.3 GPa | onset |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrOs4Sb12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Change of superconducting character in UTe2 induced by magnetic field
similarity 0.97K. Kinjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field Induced Multiple Superconducting Phases in UTe2 along Hard Magnetic Axis
similarity 0.96H. Sakai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intimate relationship between spin configuration in the triplet pair and superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.96Hiroki Matsumura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Signatures of Pressure-Induced Multicomponent Superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.96Zheyu Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in the actinide superconductor UTe2
similarity 0.96Shyam Sundar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement and reentrance of spin triplet superconductivity in UTe2 under pressure
similarity 0.96Sheng Ran et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified