← Back to search

Two-orbital model for possible superconductivity pairing mechanism in nickelates

Chen Lu, Lun-Hui Hu, Yu Wang, Fan Yang, Congjun Wu

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.054516 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The newly synthesized strontium doped RNiO2 (R=Nd, Pr, and La) superconductors have stimulated extensive interests in understanding their pairing mechanism and pairing nature. Here we study the pairing mechanism in this family from a two-orbital model comprising the Ni- 3dx2−y2 and 3dxy orbitals, equipped with extended Hubbard interactions and induced low-energy effective superexchange interactions. We then study the pairing symmetry in this system by using large scale variational Monte Carlo approach. Our results yield the intraorbital dx2−y2-wave singlet pairing as the leading pairing symmetry in the nickelates, which is analogous to the cuprates. However, there exist two important differences between the physical properties of the two families due to the fact that at the low Sr-doping regime, while the Ni-3dx2−y2 orbitals remain half-filled and singlyins occupied to form a Mott-insulating background, the Ni-3dxy orbitals accommodate nearly all the extra doped holes, which move freely on this background. The first difference lies in the single-particle aspect: while the 3dx2−y2 degree of freedom remains Mott insulating with spectra weight pinned down at zero at low dopings, the 3dxy one behaves as Fermi liquid with spectra weight near 1. The second difference lies in the pairing aspect: while the huge intra-3dx2−y2-orbital pairing gap is actually a pseudogap which has nothing to do with the SC, the small intra-3dxy-orbital pairing gap serves as the true superconducting pairing gap, which is related to the Tc via the BCS relation. Both differences can be verified by the angle-resolved photoemission spectrum.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nd1-xSrxNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown
La1-xSrxNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr1-xSrxNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers