Role of nematicity in controlling spin fluctuations and superconducting Tc in bulk FeSe
Swagata Acharya, Dimitar Pashov, Mark van Schilfgaarde
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.144507 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
FeSe undergoes a transition from a tetragonal to a slightly orthorhombic phase at 90 K and becomes a superconductor below 8 K. The orthorhombic phase is sometimes called a nematic phase because quantum oscillation, neutron, and other measurements detect a significant asymmetry in x and y. How nematicity affects superconductivity has recently become a matter of intense speculation. Here, we employ an advanced ab initio Green's function description of superconductivity and show that bulk tetragonal FeSe would, in principle, superconduct with almost the same critical temperature Tc as the nematic phase. The mechanism driving the observed nematicity is not yet understood. Since the present theory underestimates it, we simulate the full nematic asymmetry by artificially enhancing the orthorhombic distortion. For benchmarking, we compare theoretical spin susceptibilities against experimentally observed data over all energies and relevant momenta. When the orthorhombic distortion is adjusted to correlate with observed nematicity in spin susceptibility, the enhanced nematicity causes spectral weight redistribution in the Fe−3dxz and Fe−dyz orbitals, but it leads to at most a 10–15% increment in Tc. This is because the dxy orbital always remains the most strongly correlated and provides most of the source of the superconducting glue. Nematicity suppresses the density of states at the Fermi level; nevertheless, Tc increases, in contradiction to both BCS theory and the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation. We show how the increase is connected to the structure of the particle-particle vertex. Our results suggest that while nematicity may be an intrinsic property of bulk FeSe, it is not the primary force driving the superconducting pairing.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in FeSe: The Role of Nematic Order
similarity 0.98Jian Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and nematic fluctuations in a model of doped FeSe monolayers: Determinant quantum Monte Carlo study
similarity 0.97Philipp T. Dumitrescu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic state of the FeSe superconductor
similarity 0.97Sahana Rößler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bulk Superconductivity and Role of Fluctuations in the Iron-Based Superconductor FeSe at High Pressures
similarity 0.97Elena Gati et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-reversal symmetry-breaking nematic superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.97Jian Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of nematicity on the relationship between antiferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in FeSe0.91S0.09 under pressure
similarity 0.96K. Rana et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified