Nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics in p+is superconductors
Chao Xu, Wang Yang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014517 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In previous works, axion electrodynamics in three-dimensional p+is superconductors is discussed by borrowing the results from superconducting Dirac systems. However, in this work, based on a systematic path integral approach, we show that the axion electrodynamics in p+is superconductors exhibits a nonrelativistic form, which is different from the superconducting Dirac and Weyl systems. More precisely, the induced electric field does not enter into the axion action, and gauge invariance is ensured by the combination of the electric potential and the Nambu-Goldstone phase mode. Furthermore, unlike the axion angle in the Dirac case which is equal to the difference between the superconducting phases on the two Fermi surfaces of different helicities, the axion angle in the present case contains an additional sinusoidal term. As applications of the derived nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics, physical effects related to vortex lines and Witten effect are discussed. Our work reveals the differences for axion electrodynamics between the relativistic and nonrelativistic systems.
Similar papers
Nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics in superconductors
similarity 0.91Chao Xu & Wang Yang · 2020 · arXiv:2009.12998
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Abelian-Higgs vortices in the oscillating axion background
similarity 0.88Naoya Kitajima & Shota Nakagawa · 2025 · arXiv:2507.16720
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extrinsic spin-charge coupling in diffusive superconducting systems
similarity 0.87Chunli Huang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dipolar electric field induced by a vortex moving in an anisotropic superconductor
similarity 0.86Mark W. Coffey & Zhidong Hao
Source status unknown — claims are unverified