Superconductivity in a two monolayer thick indium film on Si(111)3×3-B
Takahiro Ogino, Insung Seo, Hiroo Tajiri, Masashi Nakatake, Sho-ichi Takakura, Yudai Sato, Yukio Hasegawa, Yoshihiro Gohda, Kan Nakatsuji, Hiroyuki Hirayama
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045423 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two-monolayer-thick In film with a √7×√3-rect structure is known to show superconductivity at 3.18 K on the Si(111)7×7 substrate. We synthesized the √7×√3-In-rect film on the Si(111)√3×√3−B substrate and found that it also became a superconductor at Tc = 2.38 K. The In film on the √3−B substrate showed the two-dimensional free-electron-like circular Fermi surface as on the 7×7 substrate. However, the butterfly-wing-like shape contour at the Fermi surface was found to be shifted and enlarged on the √3−B substrate. Density functional calculations revealed that it was caused by the difference of the substrate. Tc on the √3−B substrate was considered to be identical to that on the 7×7 substrate in consideration of the recently reported surface defect density dependence of Tc. These results indicated that the interaction with the substrate does not play a crucial role in the superconductivity of the two-monolayer-thick In film.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.38 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 109 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Enhancement of superconducting fluctuations in a correlated electron system coupled to the lattice
similarity 0.94A. A. Zvyagin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elucidating the magnetic and superconducting phases in the alkali metal intercalated iron chalcogenides
similarity 0.94Meng Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relationship between superconductivity and nematicity in FeSe1−xTex (x=0−0.5) films studied by complex conductivity measurements
similarity 0.94Hodaka Kurokawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in monolayer FeSe enhanced by quantum geometry
similarity 0.94Taisei Kitamura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor-Insulator Quantum Phase Transition in Disordered FeSe Thin Films
similarity 0.94R. Schneider et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multifaceted impact of a surface step on superconductivity in atomically thin films
similarity 0.94L.-F. Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified