Evolution of plasmon excitations across the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4
M. Hepting, T. D. Boyko, V. Zimmermann, M. Bejas, Y. E. Suyolcu, P. Puphal, R. J. Green, L. Zinni, J. Kim, D. Casa, M. H. Upton, D. Wong, C. Schulz, M. Bartkowiak, K. Habicht, E. Pomjakushina, G. Cristiani, G. Logvenov, M. Minola, H. Yamase, A. Greco, B. Keimer
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.214516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) at the O K- and Cu K-edges to investigate the doping dependence and temperature dependence of low-energy plasmon excitations in La2−xSrxCuO4. We observe a monotonic increase of the energy scale of the plasmons with increasing doping x in the underdoped regime, whereas a saturation occurs above optimal doping x≳0.16 and persists at least up to x=0.4. Furthermore, we find that the plasmon excitations show only a marginal temperature dependence, and possible effects due to the superconducting transition and the onset of strange metal behavior are either absent or below the detection limit of our experiment. Taking into account the strongly correlated character of the cuprates, we show that layered t−J−V model calculations accurately capture the increase of the plasmon energy in the underdoped regime. However, the computed plasmon energy continues to increase even for doping levels above x≳0.16, which is distinct from the experimentally observed saturation and reaches a broad maximum around x=0.55. We discuss whether possible lattice disorder in overdoped samples, a renormalization of the electronic correlation strength at high dopings, or an increasing relevance of nonplanar Cu and O orbitals could be responsible for the discrepancy between experiment and theory for doping levels above x=0.16.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.8Sr0.2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La2-xCaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductor-to-metal quantum phase transition in overdoped La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.96T. R. Lemberger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalously sharp superconducting transitions in overdoped La2−xSrxCuO4 films
similarity 0.96T. R. Lemberger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor-insulator phase transition in single-crystal La2−xSrxCuO4 films grown by the liquid-phase epitaxy method
similarity 0.96A. T. M. Nazmul Islam et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Doping for the Onset of Fermi-Surface Reconstruction by Charge-Density-Wave Order in the Cuprate Superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.96S. Badoux et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of the Superconducting Transition Temperature of La2−xSrxCuO4 Bilayers: Role of Pairing and Phase Stiffness
similarity 0.96Ofer Yuli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Infrared properties of epitaxial La2−xSrxCuO4 thin films in the normal and superconducting states
similarity 0.95F. Gao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified