Andreev reflection spectroscopy in strongly paired superconductors
Cyprian Lewandowski, Étienne Lantagne-Hurtubise, Alex Thomson, Stevan Nadj-Perge, Jason Alicea
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L020502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Motivated by recent experiments on low-carrier-density superconductors, including twisted multilayer graphene, we study signatures of the BCS-to-BEC evolution in Andreev reflection spectroscopy. We establish that in a standard quantum point contact geometry, Andreev reflection in a BEC superconductor is unable to mediate a zero-bias conductance beyond e2/h per lead channel. This bound is shown to result from a mapping that links the subgap conductance of BCS and BEC superconductors. We then demonstrate that sharp signatures of BEC superconductivity, including perfect Andreev reflection, can be recovered by tunneling through a suitably designed potential well. We propose various tunneling spectroscopy setups to experimentally probe this recovery.
Similar papers
Spin-polarized multiple Andreev reflections in spin-split superconductors
similarity 0.91Bo Lu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in layered structures: Implications for high-Tc grain-boundary Josephson junctions
similarity 0.91Alexander Golubov & Francesco Tafuri
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunnelling Spectroscopy of Andreev States in Graphene
similarity 0.90Landry Bretheau et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.10655
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Reflection Enhancement in Semiconductor-Superconductor Structures
similarity 0.90Shlomi Bouscher et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1802.05276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spectroscopy of doped HgTe quantum wells
similarity 0.90M. Guigou & J. Cayssol
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anatomy of point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy from the experimental point of view (review)
similarity 0.90Yu. G. Naidyuk & K. Gloos · 2017 · arXiv:1712.06903
Source status unknown — claims are unverified