Ab initio calculations of superconducting transition temperatures: When going beyond RPA is essential
Camilla Pellegrini, Carl Kukkonen, Antonio Sanna
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064511 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In ab initio calculations of superconducting properties, the Coulomb repulsion is accounted for at the GW level and is usually computed in the random phase approximation (RPA), which amounts to neglecting vertex corrections both at the polarizability level and in the self-energy. Although this approach is unjustified, the brute force inclusion of higher-order corrections to the self-energy is computationally prohibitive. We propose to use a generalized GW self-energy, where vertex corrections are incorporated into W by employing the Kukkonen and Overhauser (KO) ansatz for the effective interaction between two electrons in the electron gas. By computing the KO interaction in the adiabatic local density approximation for a diverse set of conventional superconductors, and using it in the Eliashberg equations, we find that vertex corrections lead to a systematic decrease of the critical temperature (Tc), ranging from a few percent in bulk lead to more than 40% in compressed lithium. We propose a set of simple rules to identify those systems where large Tc corrections are to be expected and hence the use of the KO interaction is recommended. Our approach offers a rigorous extension of the RPA and GW methods for the prediction of superconducting properties at a negligible extra computational cost.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 200 | 200 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic Structures of RTe2 (R=La,Ce): A Clue to the Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in CeTe1.82
similarity 0.97J. H. Shim et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity by doping in alkali-metal hydrides without applied pressure: An ab initio study
similarity 0.97M. A. Olea-Amezcua et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of bonding on superconductivity in high-pressure hydrides
similarity 0.96Christoph Heil & Lilia Boeri
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting properties of rare-earth boron hydrides at high pressure studied by first-principles calculations
similarity 0.96Simin Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of the density of states at the Fermi level on defect free energies and superconductivity: A case study of Nb3Sn
similarity 0.96Nathan S. Sitaraman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of high-temperature ambient-pressure superconductivity in hexagonal boron-rich clathrates
similarity 0.96Bin Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified