Superconductor-polariton nondissipative drag in optical microcavity
Azat F. Aminov, Alexey A. Sokolik, Yurii E. Lozovik
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.115415 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider nondissipative drag between Bose-condensed exciton polaritons in optical microcavity and embedded superconductors. This effect consists of induction of a nondissipative electric current in the superconductor by motion of polariton Bose condensate due to electron-polariton interaction, or vice versa. Using many-body theory, we calculate the drag density, characterizing magnitude of this effect, with taking into account dynamical screening of the interaction. Hoping to diminish the interaction screening and microcavity photon absorption, we consider atomically thin superconductors (both conventional s-wave and copper-oxide d-wave) of planar and nanoribbon shapes. Our estimates show that in realistic conditions the drag effect could be rather weak but observable in accurate experiments in the case of dipolar interlayer excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers. Use of spatially direct excitons, semiconductor quantum wells as the host for excitons, or thin films of bulk metallic superconductors considerably lowers the drag density.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBCO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LSCO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb1-xTixN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Tuning vortex fluctuations and the resistive transition in superconducting films with a thin overlayer
similarity 0.94Alex Gurevich
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity superconductor-polaritons
similarity 0.94Andrew A. Allocca et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeSe Thin Films Driven by the Interplay between Nematic Fluctuations and Spin-Orbit Coupling
similarity 0.94Jian Kang & Rafael M. Fernandes
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multichannel superconductivity of monolayer FeSe on SrTiO3: Interplay of spin fluctuations and electron-phonon interaction
similarity 0.94Fabian Schrodi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and nematic fluctuations in a model of doped FeSe monolayers: Determinant quantum Monte Carlo study
similarity 0.94Philipp T. Dumitrescu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting monolayer deposited on substrate: Effects of the spin-orbit coupling induced by proximity effects
similarity 0.94Andrzej Ptok et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified