Parent structures of near-ambient nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride superconductor
Mingfeng Liu, Xiangyang Liu, Jiangxu Li, Jiaxi Liu, Yan Sun, Xing-Qiu Chen, Peitao Liu
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L020102 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, near-ambient superconductivity has been experimentally evidenced in a nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride [Nature (London) 615, 244 (2023)], which yields a remarkable maximum Tc of 294 K at just 10 kbar. However, due to the difficulty of x-ray diffraction (XRD) in identifying light elements, such as hydrogen and nitrogen, the crystal structure of the superconductor remains elusive, in particular, for the actual stoichiometry of hydrogen and nitrogen and their atomistic positions. This holds even for its parent structure. Here, we set out to address this issue by performing a thorough density functional theory study on the structural, electronic, dynamical, and optical properties of lutetium hydrides. Through thermal and lattice dynamic analysis as well as XRD and superconductor color comparisons, we unambiguously clarified that the parent structures are a mixture of the dominant LuH2 phase of the CaF2 type (instead of the originally proposed LuH3 structure of the Fm3¯m space group) and the minor LuH phase of the NaCl type.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| H3P Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| ThH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YH6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YH9±x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Lu4H23 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | 110 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Structure, stability, and superconductivity of N-doped lutetium hydrides at kbar pressures
similarity 0.92Katerina P. Hilleke et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stochastic path-integral approach for predicting the superconducting temperatures of anharmonic solids
similarity 0.92Haoran Chen & Junren Shi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Colloquium: Room temperature superconductivity: The roles of theory and materials design
similarity 0.92Warren E. Pickett
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum and Classical Proton Diffusion in Superconducting Clathrate Hydrides
similarity 0.92Hui Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of near-ambient superconductivity in LuHN
similarity 0.91Xue Ming et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.08759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Systematic study of the superconducting critical temperature in two- and three-dimensional tight-binding models: A possible scenario for superconducting H3S
similarity 0.90Thiago X. R. Souza & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified