Nonlinear optical responses in multiorbital topological superconductors
Arpit Raj, Abigail Postlewaite, Swati Chaudhary, Gregory A. Fiete
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.184514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We theoretically study first- and second-order optical responses in a transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayer with distinct trivial, nodal, and time-reversal invariant topological superconducting (TRITOPS) phases. We show that the second-order dc response, also known as the photogalvanic response, contains signatures for differentiating these phases while the first-order optical response does not. We find that the high-frequency photogalvanic response is insensitive to the phase of the system, while the low-frequency response exhibits features distinguishing the three phases. At zero doping, corresponding to an electron filling in which the Fermi level lies at nodal points, there are opposite sign zero-frequency divergences in the response when approaching the nodal phase boundaries from the trivial and the TRITOPS phases. In the trivial phase, both the high-frequency and low-frequency response of the system are negative, but in the TRITOPS phase the low-frequency response becomes positive while the high-frequency response remains negative. Furthermore, since phase transitions are controlled by the Rashba spin-orbit coupling and the ratio of intraorbital and interorbital paring amplitudes, our results not only help distinguish the phases but they can also provide an estimate of the pairing amplitudes based on the photogalvanic response of the system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Strong quantum oscillations in the order parameter of two-dimensional type-II superconductors
similarity 0.97T. Maniv et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interband Phase Modes and Nonequilibrium Soliton Structures in Two-Gap Superconductors
similarity 0.97A. Gurevich & V. M. Vinokur
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear response of diffusive superconductors to ac electromagnetic fields
similarity 0.97Pascal Derendorf et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic oscillations and quasiparticle band structure in the mixed state of type-II superconductors
similarity 0.97M. R. Norman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Subtlety of modes trapped by vortices in a topological superconducting heterostructure
similarity 0.97Xin-Hai Tu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chiral Topological Superconductivity in Superconductor-Obstructed Atomic Insulator-Ferromagnetic Insulator Heterostructures
similarity 0.97Jingnan Hu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified