Universal chemical formula dependence of ab initio low-energy effective Hamiltonian in single-layer carrier-doped cuprate superconductors: Study using a hierarchical dependence extraction algorithm
Jean-Baptiste Morée, Ryotaro Arita
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.014502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We explore the possibility to control the superconducting transition temperature at optimal hole doping Tcopt in cuprates by tuning the chemical formula (CF). Tcopt can be theoretically predicted from the parameters of the ab initio low-energy effective Hamiltonian with one antibonding (AB) Cu3dx2−y2/O2pσ orbital per Cu atom in the CuO2 plane, notably the nearest-neighbor hopping amplitude |t1| and the ratio u=U/|t1|, where U is the onsite effective Coulomb repulsion. However, the CF dependence of |t1| and u is a highly nontrivial question. In this paper, we propose the universal dependence of |t1| and u on the CF and structural features in hole doped cuprates with a single CuO2 layer sandwiched between block layers. To do so, we perform extensive ab initio calculations of |t1| and u and analyze the results by employing a machine-learning method called hierarchical dependence extraction (HDE). The main results are (a) |t1| has a main-order dependence on the radii RX and RA of the apical anion X and cation A in the block layer. (|t1| increases when RX or RA decreases.) (b) u has a main-order dependence on the ionic charge ZX of X and the hole doping δ of the AB orbital. (u decreases when |ZX| increases or δ increases.) We elucidate and discuss the microscopic mechanism of items (a) and (b). We demonstrate the predictive power of the HDE by showing the consistency between items (a) and (b) and results from previous works. The present results provide a basis for optimizing superconducting properties in cuprates and possibly akin materials. Also, the HDE method offers a general platform to identify dependencies between physical quantities.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 138 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 166 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 94 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 110 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.97Motoaki Hirayama et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity Studied by Solving Ab Initio Low-Energy Effective Hamiltonians for Carrier Doped CaCuO2, Bi2Sr2CuO6, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8, and HgBa2CuO4
similarity 0.97Michael Thobias Schmid et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ab initio low-energy effective Hamiltonians for the high-temperature superconducting cuprates Bi2Sr2CuO6, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8, HgBa2CuO4, and CaCuO2
similarity 0.97Jean-Baptiste Morée et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transition temperature and a spatial dependence of the superconducting gap for multilayer high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.97Krzysztof Byczuk & Jozef Spałek
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structure and superconductivity of HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ
similarity 0.97J. L. Wagner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale structural correlations in a model cuprate superconductor
similarity 0.97Zachary W. Anderson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified