Normal state quantum geometry and superconducting domes in (111) oxide interfaces
Florian Simon, Mark O. Goerbig, Marc Gabay
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.104512 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate the influence of the normal state quantum geometry on the superconducting phase in (111)-oriented oxide interfaces and discuss some of the implications for the LaAlO3−SrTiO3 (LAO-STO) heterostructure. From a tight-binding modeling of the interface, we derive a two-band low-energy model, allowing us to analytically compute the quantum geometry and giving us access to the superfluid weight, as well as to showcase the role of two particular relevant energy scales. One is given by the trigonal crystal field which stems from the local trigonal symmetry at the interface, and the other one is due to orbital mixing at the interface. Our calculations indicate that the variation of the superfluid weight with the chemical potential μ is controlled by the quantum geometry in the low-μ limit where it presents a dome. At higher values of μ the conventional contribution dominates. To make quantitative comparisons between our results and experimental findings, we rely on an experimentally observed global reduction of the superfluid weight that we apply to both the conventional and geometric contributions. Furthermore, an experimentally measured nonmonotonic variation of μ with the gate voltage Vg is taken into account and yields a two-dome scenario for the superconducting critical temperature as a function of Vg. The observed dome in the low-Vg regime is explained by the nonmonotonic evolution of a dominant conventional part of the superfluid density. In contrast, the expected second dome at larger values of Vg limit would be due to a dominant quantum-geometric contribution.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaAlO3-SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Normal state quantum geometry and superconducting domes in (111) oxide interfaces
similarity 1.00Florian Simon et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.13993
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of topological superconductivity by orbital-selective confinement in oxide nanowires
similarity 0.94C. A. Perroni et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling spectroscopy and Majorana modes emergent from topological gapless phases in high-Tc cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92Jun-Ting Kao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of spin-orbit interaction on the phase diagram and anisotropy of the in-plane critical magnetic field at the superconducting LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface
similarity 0.92P. Wójcik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Link between the Superconducting Dome and Spin-Orbit Interaction in the (111) LaAlO/SrTiO Interface
similarity 0.91P. K. Rout et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.01717
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rise and fall of shape resonances in thin films of BCS superconductors
similarity 0.90D. Valentinis et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified