Light-modulated Andreev effects in graphene-based superconducting junctions
Miao Yu, Deliang Cao, Hong Wang, Yafang Xu, Fenghua Qi, Xingfei Zhou, Guojun Jin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155420 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the transport properties, including Andreev reflection, 0−π transition, and crossed Andreev reflection, of graphene-based superconducting junctions modulated by an off-resonant circularly polarized light and a staggered sublattice potential. Using the Dirac-Bogoliubov–de Gennes equation and the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk formula associated with numerical calculations, we can make the following findings. In a graphene-based normal conductor/superconductor (NS) junction, the differential conductance from Andreev reflection can be used to distinguish band structures. However, in a graphene-based superconductor/normal conductor/superconductor (SNS) junction, the valley polarization is induced and brings in a 0−π transition. Moreover, in a graphene-based normal conductor/superconductor/normal conductor (NSN) junction, the opposite valley polarization in two normal regions can lead to the pure and even perfect crossed Andreev reflections. The appreciable differential conductance of the pure crossed Andreev reflection is found for the 20–50 nm junction length, far less than the previous result in the graphene-based NSN junction, and it is helpful for the integration of superconducting quantum circuits. Our findings provide experimental possibilities to characterize the band structures, to realize the valley polarization-induced 0−π transition, and to design the valley-based highly efficient Cooper pair splitter in the light-modulated graphene-based superconducting junctions.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuxNi1-x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Specular Andreev reflection and Andreev interference in an Ising superconductor junction
similarity 0.96Gaoyang Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of spin-selective Andreev reflection in the vortex core of a topological superconductor
similarity 0.95Lun-Hui Hu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet double junction systems
similarity 0.94Taro Yamashita et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear optical response in superconductors in magnetic field: Quantum geometry and topological superconductivity
similarity 0.94Hiroto Tanaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Equal-spin and oblique-spin crossed Andreev reflections in ferromagnet/Ising superconductor/ferromagnet junction
similarity 0.94Wei-Tao Lu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breaking of Ginzburg-Landau description in the temperature dependence of the anisotropy in a nematic superconductor
similarity 0.93M. I. Bannikov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified