← Back to search

Ti4Ir2O: A time reversal invariant fully gapped unconventional superconductor

Debarchan Das, KeYuan Ma, Jan Jaroszynski, Vahid Sazgari, Tomasz Klimczuk, Fabian O. von Rohr, Zurab Guguchia

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.174507 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Here we report muon spin rotation (μSR) experiments on the temperature and field dependence of the effective magnetic penetration depth λ(T) in the η-carbide-type suboxide Ti4Ir2O, a superconductor with a considerably high upper critical field. The temperature dependence of λ(T), obtained from transverse-field (TF)-μSR measurements, is in perfect agreement with an isotropic fully gaped superconducting state. Furthermore, our ZF μSR results confirm that the time-reversal symmetry is preserved in the superconducting state. We find, however, a remarkably small ratio of Tc/λ0−2∼1.22. This value is close to most unconventional superconductors, showing that a very small superfluid density is present in the superconducting state of Ti4Ir2O. The presented results will pave the way for further theoretical and experimental investigations to obtain a microscopic understanding of the origin of such a high upper critical field in an isotropic single-gap superconducting system.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ti4Ir2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.3Pressure not reportedunknown
Ti4Ir2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.3Pressure not reportedonset
Ti4Ir2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.3Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers