Tuning competition between charge order and superconductivity in the square-lattice t−t′−J model
Xin Lu, Huaiming Guo, Wei-Qiang Chen, D. N. Sheng, Shou-Shu Gong
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.035139 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, a flurry of works have found strong competition between charge density wave (CDW) and superconductivity (SC) in the doped Hubbard and t−J models on the square lattice. Interestingly, some recent results suggest that the electron-phonon coupling may suppress CDW order and enhance SC. In this work, we consider the square-lattice Hubbard model with the Holstein or Su-Schrieffer-Heeger electron-phonon coupling at the large-U and antiadiabatic (infinite phonon frequency) limits, which gives an effective t−J model with either a density attractive interaction V or a JP term that contributes a larger spin exchange and a density repulsive interaction. To explore how these effective couplings may tune the competition between CDW and SC, we implement the density matrix renormalization group simulations on the t−t′−J model with V or JP coupling. We focus on the six-leg cylinder system with the next-nearest-neighbor hopping t′, which hosts partially filled stripe and d-wave SC in phase diagram. By tuning t′/t>0 and V or JP, we establish two quantum phase diagrams at 112 doping ratio. In the SC phases, the increased V or JP coupling can enhance the quasi-long-range SC order, consistent with some previous findings. Nonetheless, no SC emerges when the partially filled stripe phase disappears with increased V or JP. Instead, the system has a transition to either a phase-separation-like regime or a filled stripe phase. On the other hand, with increased t′/t, not only the partially filled stripe but the phase separation and filled stripe can also be tuned to SC phase. Our results suggest that although V and JP couplings may strengthen hole binding, the hole dynamics controlled by t′/t appears to play a more crucial role for obtaining a SC in the t−J model.
Similar papers
Emergent Superconductivity and Competing Charge Orders in Hole-Doped Square-Lattice t−J Model
similarity 0.95Xin Lu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-charge separation and unconventional superconductivity in the t−J model on the honeycomb lattice
similarity 0.91Jian-Jian Miao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergent Superconductivity and Competing Charge Orders in Hole-Doped Square-Lattice - Model
similarity 0.90Xin Lu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.03963
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripe and superconducting order competing in the Hubbard model on a square lattice studied by a combined variational Monte Carlo and tensor network method
similarity 0.89Andrew S. Darmawan et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.06327
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Diagram of the Square-Lattice -- Model for Electron-Doped Cuprates
similarity 0.89Qianqian Chen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.05893
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning superconductivity and charge density wave order by next-nearest-neighbor hopping integral in honeycomb Holstein model
similarity 0.88Hongxing Liu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.16260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified