Unified model of the Hall effect from insulator to overdoped compounds in cuprate superconductors
Júlia C. Anjos, Hércules S. Santana, E. V. L. de Mello
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.115109 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Measurements of the Hall coefficients in La2−xSrxCuO4, ranging from the undoped (x=p=0) Mott insulator to overdoped compounds, exhibit a temperature dependence that offers insights into these compounds' electronic structure. We interpret these results using a model based on the theory of phase-separation dynamics, which begins at half-filled (n=1) and at a temperature TPS(p), near the pseudogap temperature T*(p). The n=1 holes have low mobility and provide the modulations of the charge density waves (CDW). As doping increases from p=0, these modulations guide the additional p holes to occupy alternating CDW domains. This charge inhomogeneity may facilitate the formation of localized superconducting amplitudes below the critical onset temperature Tcmax(p). Using thermal activation expressions, along with quantum tunneling between the charge domains, we successfully reproduce all Hall coefficient measurements RH(p,T) and highlight the relevant energies of the cuprates. The calculations confirm three significant electronic features: the phase-separating role of the pseudogap temperature, the superconducting state achieved through phase coherence, and the two types of charge carriers whose energies and mobilities become comparable at p≈0.19, where T*(p)≈Tcmax(p). This results in a crossover from n=p to n=1+p. These findings, along with the RH(p,T) calculations from insulating to overdoped compounds, underscore the critical role of the electronic phase separation in the properties of cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
General model for explicitly hole-doped superconductor parent compounds: Electronic structure of Ca2−xNaxCuO2Cl2 as a case study
similarity 0.96Pablo Rivero et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dependence of the transition temperature on deviations from stoichiometry in the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.96Vinay Ambegaokar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal conductivity across the phase diagram of cuprates: Low-energy quasiparticles and doping dependence of the superconducting gap
similarity 0.96Mike Sutherland et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spontaneous superconductivity and optical properties of high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.96M. N. Chernodub
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of the spatially modulated dynamical spin correlations and the superconducting-transition temperature in La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.95K. Yamada et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor-to-metal quantum phase transition in overdoped La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.95T. R. Lemberger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified