Resolving competition of charge density wave and superconducting phases using the matrix product state plus mean field algorithm
Gunnar Bollmark, Thomas Köhler, Adrian Kantian
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.125141 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Materials with strong electronic correlations often exhibit a superconducting phase in close competition with other insulating phases, which is outstandingly difficult to resolve, e.g., for a group of quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D) materials such as the cuprates, even for the simplified minimal model of these materials, the doped 2D Hubbard model. The present work shows how quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) systems, 2D and three-dimensional (3D) arrays of weakly coupled 1D correlated electrons, are much more amenable to resolving such competition, treating both instabilities on equal footing. Using the recently established matrix product state plus mean field (MPS+MF) approach for fermions [Bollmark et al., Phys. Rev. X 13, 011039 (2023)], we demonstrate that large systems can be reached readily in these systems, which opens up the thermodynamic regime via extrapolation. Focusing on basic model systems, 3D arrays of negative-U Hubbard chains with additional nearest-neighbor interaction V, we show that despite the MF component of the MPS+MF technique, we can reproduce the expected coexistence of the superconductivity and charge density wave at V=0 for density n=1. We then show how we can tune away from coexistence by both tuning V and doping the system. This work thus paves the way to deploy two-channel MPS+MF theory on some highly demanding high-Tc superconducting systems, such as 3D arrays of repulsive-U doped Hubbard ladders; we recently characterized the properties of such arrays in single-channel MPS+MF calculations [Bollmark et al., Phys. Rev. X 13, 011039 (2023)].
Similar papers
Itinerant magnetism in Hubbard models with long-range interactions
similarity 0.87Johannes Dieplinger et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.00955
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Random matrix model for antiferromagnetism and superconductivity on a two-dimensional lattice
similarity 0.87Benoît Vanderheyden & A. D. Jackson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Random matrix model for antiferromagnetism and superconductivity on a two-dimensional lattice
similarity 0.86Benoit Vanderheyden & A D Jackson · 2008 · arXiv:0811.3571
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Preformed Cooper pairing and the uncondensed normal-state component in phase-fluctuating monolayer cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.86Fei Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exotic superconductivity through bosons in a dynamical cluster approximation
similarity 0.86Thomas Bilitewski & Lode Pollet
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional superconductivity in the extended Hubbard model: Weak-coupling renormalization group
similarity 0.86Sebastian Wolf et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified